Suspected infection in children with cancer

PD JONES MB, BS, DCH, FRACP, RL HENRY HENRY MD, FRACP, J STUART STUART MB, BS, FRACP, MMED Sci, L FRANCIS FRANCIS BA, MMED STAT
{"title":"Suspected infection in children with cancer","authors":"PD JONES MB, BS, DCH, FRACP,&nbsp;RL HENRY HENRY MD, FRACP,&nbsp;J STUART STUART MB, BS, FRACP, MMED Sci,&nbsp;L FRANCIS FRANCIS BA, MMED STAT","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1998.00284.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The microbiology and severity of suspected infections in children with cancer admitted to the John Hunter Children’s Hospital was determined in order to assess whether any alteration to the infection treatment protocol was required. All children with cancer aged 1–17 years who had an episode of suspected or proven infection that required parenteral treatment at John Hunter Children’s Hospital (JHCH) during 1994/95 were reviewed. Thirty-seven children were treated for cancer at JHCH; 62 admissions for suspected infection which involved 26 children were reviewed. Sixteen of these children had a permanent central line. Children with a central line had an increase in the number of days of inpatient treatment required for the treatment of suspected infection, and they had more episodes of infection. A pathogen was isolated more frequently with blood cultures being positive more often and Gram- positive species were methicillin resistant more often. These differences were not statistically significant. A pathogen was isolated in 52% of admissions. Sixteen pathogens were Gram positive; 12 were Gram negative, two were fungal and two were viral. Blood cultures were positive in 21 of 62 admissions, skin swabs in four admissions, urine cultures in three admissions, stool in two admissions and one species was isolated from an epidural catheter tip and from the sputum. In 16% of admissions, the identified organism was resistant to the initial empirical therapy of tobramycin and piperacillin. In a further 13%, flucloxacillin was added to the empirical regimen when a sensitive <i>Staphylococcus</i> was identified. No significant differences between the culture-negative and culture-positive groups were observed in admission pulse, fever or admission neutrophil count. However, those patients with a central line had a higher incidence of having a pathogen isolated if their temperature was &gt; 39.5°C. The median length of stay was longer for patients with a pathogen isolated on blood culture. Admission blood cultures were positive in 53% of admissions with an initial neutrophil count &gt; 1000 × 10<sup>9</sup>/mL. Each of these children had a central line. Only one child died of infection during the 2-year study period. This review supports the observations that Gram-positive infection is now more common than Gram-negative infection in children with cancer. Despite the management advantages a permanent central line affords it is clear those children with a central line have an increased rate of infection and there needs to be caution in their use. The most important is the observation that any fever &gt; 39.5°C in a child with a central line is likely to be associated with a documented infection irrespective of the neutrophil count. The clinical outcomes observed in the present study indicate that tobramycin and piperacillin are effective empirical treatments for suspected infection in children with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"18 4","pages":"275-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1998.00284.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1998.00284.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The microbiology and severity of suspected infections in children with cancer admitted to the John Hunter Children’s Hospital was determined in order to assess whether any alteration to the infection treatment protocol was required. All children with cancer aged 1–17 years who had an episode of suspected or proven infection that required parenteral treatment at John Hunter Children’s Hospital (JHCH) during 1994/95 were reviewed. Thirty-seven children were treated for cancer at JHCH; 62 admissions for suspected infection which involved 26 children were reviewed. Sixteen of these children had a permanent central line. Children with a central line had an increase in the number of days of inpatient treatment required for the treatment of suspected infection, and they had more episodes of infection. A pathogen was isolated more frequently with blood cultures being positive more often and Gram- positive species were methicillin resistant more often. These differences were not statistically significant. A pathogen was isolated in 52% of admissions. Sixteen pathogens were Gram positive; 12 were Gram negative, two were fungal and two were viral. Blood cultures were positive in 21 of 62 admissions, skin swabs in four admissions, urine cultures in three admissions, stool in two admissions and one species was isolated from an epidural catheter tip and from the sputum. In 16% of admissions, the identified organism was resistant to the initial empirical therapy of tobramycin and piperacillin. In a further 13%, flucloxacillin was added to the empirical regimen when a sensitive Staphylococcus was identified. No significant differences between the culture-negative and culture-positive groups were observed in admission pulse, fever or admission neutrophil count. However, those patients with a central line had a higher incidence of having a pathogen isolated if their temperature was > 39.5°C. The median length of stay was longer for patients with a pathogen isolated on blood culture. Admission blood cultures were positive in 53% of admissions with an initial neutrophil count > 1000 × 109/mL. Each of these children had a central line. Only one child died of infection during the 2-year study period. This review supports the observations that Gram-positive infection is now more common than Gram-negative infection in children with cancer. Despite the management advantages a permanent central line affords it is clear those children with a central line have an increased rate of infection and there needs to be caution in their use. The most important is the observation that any fever > 39.5°C in a child with a central line is likely to be associated with a documented infection irrespective of the neutrophil count. The clinical outcomes observed in the present study indicate that tobramycin and piperacillin are effective empirical treatments for suspected infection in children with cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患儿疑似感染
对约翰·亨特儿童医院收治的癌症患儿的微生物学和疑似感染的严重程度进行了测定,以评估是否需要对感染治疗方案进行任何修改。对1994/95年期间在约翰·亨特儿童医院(JHCH)发生过疑似或证实感染并需要肠外治疗的所有1-17岁癌症儿童进行了审查。37名儿童在JHCH接受癌症治疗;对62例疑似感染住院病例进行了审查,涉及26名儿童。其中16个孩子有永久性中央静脉导管。有中心静脉管的儿童因疑似感染而需要住院治疗的天数增加,并且他们有更多的感染发作。病原菌被分离的频率更高,血培养阳性的频率更高,革兰氏阳性的菌种对甲氧西林耐药的频率更高。这些差异没有统计学意义。在52%的入院患者中分离出病原体。革兰氏阳性16例;革兰氏阴性12例,真菌2例,病毒2例。62例患者中有21例血培养阳性,4例皮肤拭子阳性,3例尿培养阳性,2例粪便培养阳性,从硬膜外导管尖端和痰中分离出1种。在16%的入院患者中,鉴定出的微生物对妥布霉素和哌拉西林的初始经验性治疗具有耐药性。在另外13%的病例中,当发现敏感葡萄球菌时,在经验方案中加入氟氯西林。培养阴性组与培养阳性组入院脉搏、发热、入院中性粒细胞计数均无显著差异。然而,那些有中央静脉管的病人,如果他们的体温是>39.5°C。血培养分离出病原体的患者中位住院时间更长。入院时血液培养阳性的患者占入院时中性粒细胞计数的53%;1000 × 109/mL。每个孩子都有中心静脉导管。在两年的研究期间,只有一名儿童死于感染。本综述支持革兰氏阳性感染现在比革兰氏阴性感染在癌症儿童中更常见的观察结果。尽管永久性中心静脉管提供了管理优势,但很明显,使用中心静脉管的儿童感染率增加,使用时需要谨慎。最重要的是要注意任何发烧。无论中性粒细胞计数如何,有中心静脉管的儿童的39.5°C可能与记录的感染有关。本研究观察到的临床结果表明妥布霉素和哌拉西林是治疗癌症患儿疑似感染的有效经验疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health technology assessment. Notices Letters to the Editor Notices Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1