D W Lockner, V H Heyward, S E Griffin, M B Marques, L M Stolarczyk, D R Wagner
{"title":"Cross-validation of modified fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance equations.","authors":"D W Lockner, V H Heyward, S E Griffin, M B Marques, L M Stolarczyk, D R Wagner","doi":"10.1123/ijsn.9.1.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Segal fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations are useful for predicting fat-free mass (FFM). Stolarczyk et al. Proposed a modified method of averaging the two equations for individuals who are neither lean nor obese, thus eliminating the need to know % BF a priori. To cross-validate this modification, we compared FFM determined using the averaging method versus hydrostatic weighing for 76 adults. Per the averaging method, accuracy for males was excellent (r =.91, SEE = 2.7 kg, E = 2.7 kg), with 78% of individuals within +/- .5% BF predicted by hydrostatic weighing. Accuracy for females was lower (r =.88, SEE = 3.0 kg, E = 3.1 kg), with % BF of 51% within +/- 3.5% of the reference method. The relative ease and practicality of the averaging method and the results of this study indicate this method may be useful with a diverse group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14321,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sport nutrition","volume":"9 1","pages":"48-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1123/ijsn.9.1.48","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sport nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsn.9.1.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The Segal fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations are useful for predicting fat-free mass (FFM). Stolarczyk et al. Proposed a modified method of averaging the two equations for individuals who are neither lean nor obese, thus eliminating the need to know % BF a priori. To cross-validate this modification, we compared FFM determined using the averaging method versus hydrostatic weighing for 76 adults. Per the averaging method, accuracy for males was excellent (r =.91, SEE = 2.7 kg, E = 2.7 kg), with 78% of individuals within +/- .5% BF predicted by hydrostatic weighing. Accuracy for females was lower (r =.88, SEE = 3.0 kg, E = 3.1 kg), with % BF of 51% within +/- 3.5% of the reference method. The relative ease and practicality of the averaging method and the results of this study indicate this method may be useful with a diverse group.