Teacher receptivity to a system-wide change in a centralized education system: a Rasch measurement model analysis.

Journal of outcome measurement Pub Date : 1999-01-01
R F Waugh
{"title":"Teacher receptivity to a system-wide change in a centralized education system: a Rasch measurement model analysis.","authors":"R F Waugh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Education Department of Western Australia has implemented a new system called Student Outcome Statements, by trial in 1995/1996, then an a voluntary basis from 1997, with the intention of making it mandatory after 2001. The system describes, in order, the outcomes that students are expected to achieve in eight broad learning areas. The study has three aims. One, to create a scale for teacher receptivity to the use of Student Outcome Statements, based on eight orientations to receptivity: evaluative attitudes, behavior intentions, feelings towards Student Outcome Statements compared to the previous system, the benefits of the new system, support from significant others, alleviation of concerns, collaboration with other teachers, and involvement in decision-making. Two, to analyze the psychometric properties of the scale using the Extended Logistic Model of Rasch (Andrich, 1988; Rasch, 1960/1980) with the computer program RUMM (Andrich, Sheridan & Luo, 1997). Three, to provide advice to decision-makers about how better to implement the system of Student Outcome Statements.</p>","PeriodicalId":79673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of outcome measurement","volume":"3 1","pages":"71-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of outcome measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Education Department of Western Australia has implemented a new system called Student Outcome Statements, by trial in 1995/1996, then an a voluntary basis from 1997, with the intention of making it mandatory after 2001. The system describes, in order, the outcomes that students are expected to achieve in eight broad learning areas. The study has three aims. One, to create a scale for teacher receptivity to the use of Student Outcome Statements, based on eight orientations to receptivity: evaluative attitudes, behavior intentions, feelings towards Student Outcome Statements compared to the previous system, the benefits of the new system, support from significant others, alleviation of concerns, collaboration with other teachers, and involvement in decision-making. Two, to analyze the psychometric properties of the scale using the Extended Logistic Model of Rasch (Andrich, 1988; Rasch, 1960/1980) with the computer program RUMM (Andrich, Sheridan & Luo, 1997). Three, to provide advice to decision-makers about how better to implement the system of Student Outcome Statements.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集中式教育系统中教师对全系统变革的接受程度:Rasch测量模型分析。
西澳大利亚州教育部在1995/1996年试行了一项名为“学生成绩陈述”的新制度,从1997年开始实行自愿制,并打算在2001年以后强制实行。该系统按顺序描述了学生在八个广泛的学习领域期望取得的成果。这项研究有三个目的。第一,根据接受度的八个方向,创建教师对使用学生成果陈述的接受度量表:评价态度、行为意图、与以前系统相比对学生成果陈述的感受、新系统的好处、重要他人的支持、减轻担忧、与其他教师的合作以及参与决策。二是运用Rasch (Andrich, 1988)的扩展Logistic模型分析量表的心理测量特性;Rasch, 1960/1980)与计算机程序RUMM (Andrich, Sheridan & Luo, 1997)。第三,就如何更好地实施学生成绩陈述系统向决策者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model. Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL). Competency gradient for child-parent centers. Alternate forms reliability of the assessment of motor and process skills.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1