Cognitive processing speed in Lyme disease.

D A Pollina, M Sliwinski, N K Squires, L B Krupp
{"title":"Cognitive processing speed in Lyme disease.","authors":"D A Pollina,&nbsp;M Sliwinski,&nbsp;N K Squires,&nbsp;L B Krupp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to more precisely define the nature of the cognitive processing deficits in the patients with Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Lyme disease has been associated with cognitive disturbances.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixteen patients who met the Centers for Disease Control's case definition for Lyme disease and 15 age- and education-matched control subjects completed two computerized assessments. The first was a matching procedure that assessed perceptual/motor speed. The second task was an alphabet-arithmetic (AA) test that measured the speed of mental arithmetic. On the matching task, subjects judged as true or false simple identity equations (e.g., B + 0 = B). On the AA task, subjects indicated the veracity of equations of the same form as those of the matching task but which required mental arithmetic (e.g., A + 3 = D). The use of this paradigm permits sensory or motor slowing to be distinguished from slowed cognitive processing speed. Also, the tests do not involve automated or overlearned responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lyme disease patients and healthy controls did not differ in perceptual/motor speed. However, Lyme disease patients' response times were significantly longer than those of healthy controls during the AA task, demonstrating specific impairments in mental activation speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that Lyme disease patients show specific deficits when initiating a cognitive process. These impairments are independent of sensory, perceptual, or motor deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"12 1","pages":"72-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to more precisely define the nature of the cognitive processing deficits in the patients with Lyme disease.

Background: Lyme disease has been associated with cognitive disturbances.

Method: Sixteen patients who met the Centers for Disease Control's case definition for Lyme disease and 15 age- and education-matched control subjects completed two computerized assessments. The first was a matching procedure that assessed perceptual/motor speed. The second task was an alphabet-arithmetic (AA) test that measured the speed of mental arithmetic. On the matching task, subjects judged as true or false simple identity equations (e.g., B + 0 = B). On the AA task, subjects indicated the veracity of equations of the same form as those of the matching task but which required mental arithmetic (e.g., A + 3 = D). The use of this paradigm permits sensory or motor slowing to be distinguished from slowed cognitive processing speed. Also, the tests do not involve automated or overlearned responses.

Results: Lyme disease patients and healthy controls did not differ in perceptual/motor speed. However, Lyme disease patients' response times were significantly longer than those of healthy controls during the AA task, demonstrating specific impairments in mental activation speed.

Conclusions: These results suggest that Lyme disease patients show specific deficits when initiating a cognitive process. These impairments are independent of sensory, perceptual, or motor deficits.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱姆病的认知处理速度。
目的:本研究的目的是更准确地定义莱姆病患者认知加工缺陷的性质。背景:莱姆病与认知障碍有关。方法:16名符合疾病控制中心莱姆病病例定义的患者和15名年龄和教育程度相匹配的对照受试者完成了两项计算机化评估。第一个是评估知觉/运动速度的匹配程序。第二个任务是字母算术(AA)测试,测量心算的速度。在配对任务中,被试判断简单同一性方程(如B + 0 = B)为真或假。在AA任务中,被试指出与配对任务相同形式但需要心算的方程(如A + 3 = D)的准确性。使用这种范式可以将感觉或运动减慢与认知加工速度减慢区分出来。此外,测试不涉及自动或过度学习的反应。结果:莱姆病患者和健康对照组在知觉/运动速度上无差异。然而,在AA任务中,莱姆病患者的反应时间明显长于健康对照组,这表明在心智激活速度上存在特异性损伤。结论:这些结果表明莱姆病患者在启动认知过程时表现出特定的缺陷。这些损伤与感觉、知觉或运动缺陷无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorientation of attention in Huntington disease. A multivariate classification study of attentional orienting in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Hypersexuality after pallidal surgery in Parkinson disease. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in a patient with psychotic symptoms. Cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence of individual variability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1