Prognostic scoring systems for risk assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Forum (Genoa, Italy) Pub Date : 1999-01-01
P L Greenberg, G F Sanz, M A Sanz
{"title":"Prognostic scoring systems for risk assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes.","authors":"P L Greenberg,&nbsp;G F Sanz,&nbsp;M A Sanz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical heterogeneity complicates therapy planning and makes it difficult to evaluate clinical trials in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Thus, the development of a prognostic classification of MDS is of major clinical relevance, especially when considering the advanced age of most patients and the aggressiveness of the treatment modalities available. This review summarises the results of different studies focusing on prognostic factors in MDS and describes the relative advantages of the prognostic scoring systems that have been recently developed. This paper also discusses the prognostic factors of particular subtypes of patients. The percentage of marrow blasts, cytogenetic pattern and number and degree of cytopenias are the most powerful prognostic indicators in MDS. Although some limitations are evident, the recently developed scoring systems, and particularly the International Prognostic Scoring System, are extremely useful for predicting survival and acute leukaemic risk in individuals with MDS and should be incorporated into the design and analysis of therapeutic trials in these disorders. A risk-adapted treatment strategy is now possible and highly recommended for MDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79489,"journal":{"name":"Forum (Genoa, Italy)","volume":"9 1","pages":"17-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum (Genoa, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical heterogeneity complicates therapy planning and makes it difficult to evaluate clinical trials in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Thus, the development of a prognostic classification of MDS is of major clinical relevance, especially when considering the advanced age of most patients and the aggressiveness of the treatment modalities available. This review summarises the results of different studies focusing on prognostic factors in MDS and describes the relative advantages of the prognostic scoring systems that have been recently developed. This paper also discusses the prognostic factors of particular subtypes of patients. The percentage of marrow blasts, cytogenetic pattern and number and degree of cytopenias are the most powerful prognostic indicators in MDS. Although some limitations are evident, the recently developed scoring systems, and particularly the International Prognostic Scoring System, are extremely useful for predicting survival and acute leukaemic risk in individuals with MDS and should be incorporated into the design and analysis of therapeutic trials in these disorders. A risk-adapted treatment strategy is now possible and highly recommended for MDS patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨髓增生异常综合征风险评估的预后评分系统。
临床异质性使治疗计划复杂化,并使评估骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的临床试验变得困难。因此,MDS预后分类的发展具有重要的临床意义,特别是考虑到大多数患者的高龄和可用的治疗方式的侵袭性。本文综述了MDS预后因素的不同研究结果,并描述了最近开发的预后评分系统的相对优势。本文还讨论了特定亚型患者的预后因素。骨髓原细胞百分比、细胞遗传学模式和细胞减少的数量和程度是MDS最有力的预后指标。尽管存在一些明显的局限性,但最近开发的评分系统,特别是国际预后评分系统,对于预测MDS患者的生存和急性白血病风险非常有用,应该将其纳入这些疾病治疗试验的设计和分析。一种适应风险的治疗策略现在是可能的,强烈推荐MDS患者使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of integrated treatments on patient management in solid tumors: from diagnosis to palliative care. Primary and metastatic brain tumors. Gastrointestinal tumors. Integrated treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. Genetics of melanoma susceptibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1