The domiciliary consultation service: outdated anachronism or essential part of community psychiatric outreach?

Health trends Pub Date : 1992-01-01
K Sutherby, S Srinath, G Strathdee
{"title":"The domiciliary consultation service: outdated anachronism or essential part of community psychiatric outreach?","authors":"K Sutherby,&nbsp;S Srinath,&nbsp;G Strathdee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes a retrospective audit of a domiciliary visiting service in adult psychiatry in one district over a six-month period. General practitioners requested urgent assessment visits for three-quarters of the sample population, but were not present when the consultant attended. When the referrals were compared to the official definition of a domiciliary visit, less than a third were considered to fit the criteria. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"24 3","pages":"103-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes a retrospective audit of a domiciliary visiting service in adult psychiatry in one district over a six-month period. General practitioners requested urgent assessment visits for three-quarters of the sample population, but were not present when the consultant attended. When the referrals were compared to the official definition of a domiciliary visit, less than a third were considered to fit the criteria. The implications of these findings are discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上门咨询服务:过时的时代错误还是社区精神病学外展的重要组成部分?
本文描述了一个回顾性审计的住家拜访服务在成人精神病学在一个地区超过六个月的时间。全科医生要求四分之三的样本人口进行紧急评估访问,但当顾问出席时并不在场。当将这些转诊与官方对住家访问的定义进行比较时,不到三分之一的人被认为符合标准。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variations in clinical experience of pre-registration house officers: the effect of London. Job satisfaction and health of house officers in the West Midlands. Use of Office of Population Censuses and Surveys records in medical research and clinical audit. The demand for primary dental care at a dental teaching hospital, 1989 and 1993. General hospital services for attempted suicide patients: a survey in one region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1