Distinguishing negligence from intentional tort when a health care provider deviates from a patient's consent.

The Medical staff counselor Pub Date : 1993-01-01
C A Cole, M D Holtz
{"title":"Distinguishing negligence from intentional tort when a health care provider deviates from a patient's consent.","authors":"C A Cole,&nbsp;M D Holtz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for \"technical battery\"--an intentional tort. This policy has allowed plaintiffs to circumvent California's statutory malpractice damage limits and seek punitive damages, thus posing a significant threat to the foundation of California medical malpractice tort law reform. The California Supreme Court recently acknowledged the problem and appears to be taking steps toward a solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"7 2","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of California appellate courts have held that a health care provider's unintentional deviation from a patient's consent will support a cause of action for "technical battery"--an intentional tort. This policy has allowed plaintiffs to circumvent California's statutory malpractice damage limits and seek punitive damages, thus posing a significant threat to the foundation of California medical malpractice tort law reform. The California Supreme Court recently acknowledged the problem and appears to be taking steps toward a solution.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区分医疗服务提供者违背患者同意时的过失与故意侵权。
加利福尼亚州的一些上诉法院认为,医疗服务提供者无意中偏离患者的同意将支持“技术性殴打”的诉讼理由,这是一种故意侵权行为。这一政策使得原告可以规避加州的法定医疗事故损害赔偿限制并寻求惩罚性损害赔偿,从而对加州医疗事故侵权法改革的基础构成了重大威胁。加州最高法院最近承认了这一问题,似乎正在采取措施寻求解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health care reform and the practice of medicine. The evolution of medical staff credentialing. Physicians' tort liability for communications relating to AIDS. Antitrust pitfalls in outpatient services. Preparing adequate medical staff committee minutes: tips for handling a difficult task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1