Grading health care's Gucci-Gulch gang.

{"title":"Grading health care's Gucci-Gulch gang.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"special interest group\" has never conjured up warm and fuzzy feelings, and certainly not among the pseudo-populist Clinton Administration as it tries to pull off health reform. But when these groups aren't using their lobbying muscles to kill or reshape legislation, they can genuinely help lawmakers understand the real-world effect of policy changes big and small. That's why the editorial staff of the Journal of American Health Policy decided to pass judgment on a dozen key health lobbying groups in its 1993 Report Card. Grades reflect the groups' impact on the legislative process, willingness to compromise, perceived level of integrity, and grass-roots organizing. As with previous report cards, we have graded on a curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":79741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of American health policy","volume":"3 4","pages":"40-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of American health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term "special interest group" has never conjured up warm and fuzzy feelings, and certainly not among the pseudo-populist Clinton Administration as it tries to pull off health reform. But when these groups aren't using their lobbying muscles to kill or reshape legislation, they can genuinely help lawmakers understand the real-world effect of policy changes big and small. That's why the editorial staff of the Journal of American Health Policy decided to pass judgment on a dozen key health lobbying groups in its 1993 Report Card. Grades reflect the groups' impact on the legislative process, willingness to compromise, perceived level of integrity, and grass-roots organizing. As with previous report cards, we have graded on a curve.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给医疗保健行业的Gucci-Gulch团伙打分。
“特殊利益集团”这个词从来没有让人产生温暖和模糊的感觉,在试图实现医疗改革的伪民粹主义克林顿政府中,当然也没有。但是,当这些团体不利用他们的游说力量来扼杀或重塑立法时,他们可以真正帮助立法者了解大大小小的政策变化对现实世界的影响。这就是为什么《美国卫生政策杂志》的编辑人员决定在其1993年的报告卡中对十几个主要的卫生游说团体进行评判。等级反映了团体对立法程序的影响、妥协的意愿、诚信的感知水平和基层组织。和以前的成绩单一样,我们是按曲线评分的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drug industry finds new partners in cost-containment quest. Estimating the real number of chronically uninsured. Two studies, one conclusion: employer health insurance eroding. Pharmacies take uniform price demands to court. Patient Protection Act: investing in patient care, not corporate profits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1