MDs voice similar rationales for treatment withdrawal and euthanasia.

Hospital ethics Pub Date : 1994-05-01
{"title":"MDs voice similar rationales for treatment withdrawal and euthanasia.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the withdrawal of treatment and active euthanasia are viewed as two different processes with two different objectives, the conditions under which these actions are justified by physicians have much in common, as the following articles on two new surveys show.</p>","PeriodicalId":79630,"journal":{"name":"Hospital ethics","volume":"10 3","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the withdrawal of treatment and active euthanasia are viewed as two different processes with two different objectives, the conditions under which these actions are justified by physicians have much in common, as the following articles on two new surveys show.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学博士对停止治疗和安乐死提出了类似的理由。
尽管停止治疗和主动安乐死被视为两个不同的过程,有着两个不同的目标,但正如以下关于两项新调查的文章所显示的那样,医生证明这些行为是正当的条件有很多共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managed care woes accumulate. Social responsibility model proposed for organizational ethics. Ohio patients go public to raise funds for services. HCFA issues final rule for PSDA (Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990). Debates over assisted dying continue to spread.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1