Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.

Journal of health care marketing Pub Date : 1995-01-01
M F Hall
{"title":"Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.","authors":"M F Hall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates about whether to use telephone or mail to survey discharged patients are waged in many hospitals. Findings from a methodological test indicate the two methods result in significant differences in evaluations--differences that health care marketers would be wise to heed. Mail-back questionnaires generate a wider range of responses and minimize the \"acquiescence bias\" telephone interviews tend to elicit, especially in health care surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":79667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health care marketing","volume":"15 1","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health care marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debates about whether to use telephone or mail to survey discharged patients are waged in many hospitals. Findings from a methodological test indicate the two methods result in significant differences in evaluations--differences that health care marketers would be wise to heed. Mail-back questionnaires generate a wider range of responses and minimize the "acquiescence bias" telephone interviews tend to elicit, especially in health care surveys.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者满意还是默许?比较邮件和电话调查结果。
关于是用电话还是用邮件调查出院病人的争论在许多医院进行着。一项方法学测试的结果表明,这两种方法在评估中产生了显著差异——卫生保健营销人员应该明智地注意到这些差异。邮寄回的问卷产生了更广泛的回答,并最大限度地减少了电话访谈往往引起的“默认偏见”,特别是在卫生保健调查中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resource guide. Marketing-driven change management. Mega-niching: retail lessons for health care. The 'superior' product that failed in Hong Kong. Satisfaction with HMOs. Accessibility issues top the list for patients in commercial groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1