Edge targeting reduces the number of shock waves required for biliary ESWL in vitro.

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1993-07-01
J Affronti, T Flournoy, J Baillie, F Cocks
{"title":"Edge targeting reduces the number of shock waves required for biliary ESWL in vitro.","authors":"J Affronti,&nbsp;T Flournoy,&nbsp;J Baillie,&nbsp;F Cocks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro experiments were conducted to determine if differences in targeting would effect stone fragmentation. Ten pairs of twin gallstones were used. The stones in each pair were identical in volume, diameter, radiolucency, and gross shape. One stone from each pair was subjected to shock waves focused at the center of the stone; the other was treated with shock waves targeted at the edge. Lithotripsy was terminated when all fragments were less than 5mm in diameter. The total number of shock waves used for each stone was recorded. In 7 of 10 pairs, fewer shock waves were required to fragment the edge targeted stone than the center targeted stone. In two of the remaining three pairs, equal numbers of shock waves were required for complete fragmentation. The difference between edge targeting and center targeting was shown to be statistically significant using the nonparametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. (1 tailed = p less than 0.02, 2 tailed = p less than 0.04). These findings suggest that the outcome of biliary lithotripsy may be improved by targeting the edge of the stone.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 3","pages":"179-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro experiments were conducted to determine if differences in targeting would effect stone fragmentation. Ten pairs of twin gallstones were used. The stones in each pair were identical in volume, diameter, radiolucency, and gross shape. One stone from each pair was subjected to shock waves focused at the center of the stone; the other was treated with shock waves targeted at the edge. Lithotripsy was terminated when all fragments were less than 5mm in diameter. The total number of shock waves used for each stone was recorded. In 7 of 10 pairs, fewer shock waves were required to fragment the edge targeted stone than the center targeted stone. In two of the remaining three pairs, equal numbers of shock waves were required for complete fragmentation. The difference between edge targeting and center targeting was shown to be statistically significant using the nonparametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. (1 tailed = p less than 0.02, 2 tailed = p less than 0.04). These findings suggest that the outcome of biliary lithotripsy may be improved by targeting the edge of the stone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘靶向减少体外胆道ESWL所需的冲击波数量。
进行了体外实验,以确定靶向性的差异是否会影响结石碎裂。使用了10对双胆结石。每对钻石在体积、直径、透光率和大体形状上都是相同的。每对石头中的一颗受到集中在石头中心的冲击波的影响;另一组则用冲击波对准边缘。当所有碎片直径小于5mm时终止碎石。记录每颗石头所使用的冲击波总数。在10对中的7对中,粉碎边缘目标结石所需的冲击波比粉碎中心目标结石所需的冲击波要少。在剩下的三对中,有两对需要相同数量的冲击波才能完全破碎。使用非参数Wilcoxin符号秩检验,边缘靶向和中心靶向之间的差异具有统计学意义。(1尾= p < 0.02, 2尾= p < 0.04)。这些发现表明,针对结石边缘进行胆道碎石可能会改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Dornier MPL 9000 for single gallstones. Inhibitory effect of high energy shock waves and radiotherapy in vitro. The influence of electrode shape on the performance of electrohydraulic lithotripters. Evaluation of patient controlled sedation and analgesia for ESWL. Treatment of ureteral calculi with an 8.3F disposable shaft rigid ureteroscope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1