Use of a continuous alfentanil infusion for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal calculi.

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1992-07-01
J J Plutchok, H I Kortis, D W Amory, B K Wagner
{"title":"Use of a continuous alfentanil infusion for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal calculi.","authors":"J J Plutchok,&nbsp;H I Kortis,&nbsp;D W Amory,&nbsp;B K Wagner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the most widely used treatment for renal calculi. Newer second generation lithotripters are being produced, which are considered to be less painful than their prototypes. Thus, the trend in anesthesia for ESWL is away from general endotracheal and regional anesthesia and toward less involved and more easily monitored techniques such as intravenous analgesia (IVA). This report relates our experience with a continuous alfentanil infusion for ESWL treatment of renal calculi with a nonimmersion second generation Dornier HM-4 lithotripter model. Thirty-five patients treated pre-operatively with droperidol and midazolam, followed by a continuous infusion of alfentanil, reported excellent pain relief via a numerical pain score and manifested little, if any, hypertension or tachycardia. Stone fragmentation, fluoroscopy, and recovery time did not differ between patients receiving IVA or general anesthesia. Potential disadvantages of IVA include elevation of transcutaneous CO 2, bradycardia in 14 patients requiring the use of atropine, slightly longer ESWL time, increased number of shocks needed for fragmentation, and a small failure rate, with 11% of patients requiring general anesthesia. With proper patient selection and respiratory monitoring, IVA is highly recommended for ESWL in the treatment of renal calculi.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"4 3","pages":"235-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the most widely used treatment for renal calculi. Newer second generation lithotripters are being produced, which are considered to be less painful than their prototypes. Thus, the trend in anesthesia for ESWL is away from general endotracheal and regional anesthesia and toward less involved and more easily monitored techniques such as intravenous analgesia (IVA). This report relates our experience with a continuous alfentanil infusion for ESWL treatment of renal calculi with a nonimmersion second generation Dornier HM-4 lithotripter model. Thirty-five patients treated pre-operatively with droperidol and midazolam, followed by a continuous infusion of alfentanil, reported excellent pain relief via a numerical pain score and manifested little, if any, hypertension or tachycardia. Stone fragmentation, fluoroscopy, and recovery time did not differ between patients receiving IVA or general anesthesia. Potential disadvantages of IVA include elevation of transcutaneous CO 2, bradycardia in 14 patients requiring the use of atropine, slightly longer ESWL time, increased number of shocks needed for fragmentation, and a small failure rate, with 11% of patients requiring general anesthesia. With proper patient selection and respiratory monitoring, IVA is highly recommended for ESWL in the treatment of renal calculi.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用连续阿芬太尼输注体外冲击波碎石治疗肾结石。
体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)是治疗肾结石最广泛的方法。新的第二代碎石机正在生产中,被认为比原型机更省力。因此,ESWL麻醉的趋势是远离全身气管内和区域麻醉,而转向较少介入和更容易监测的技术,如静脉镇痛(IVA)。本报告介绍了我们使用第二代多尼尔mh -4型非浸没碎石机持续输注阿芬太尼进行ESWL治疗肾结石的经验。35例患者术前应用氟哌啶醇和咪达唑仑,随后持续输注阿芬太尼,通过数值疼痛评分报告了良好的疼痛缓解,并且几乎没有表现出高血压或心动过速。结石碎裂、透视检查和恢复时间在接受IVA或全身麻醉的患者之间没有差异。IVA的潜在缺点包括经皮co2升高,14例需要使用阿托品的患者出现心动过缓,ESWL时间稍长,碎片化所需的电击次数增加,失败率小,11%的患者需要全身麻醉。在适当的患者选择和呼吸监测下,IVA被强烈推荐用于ESWL治疗肾结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Dornier MPL 9000 for single gallstones. Inhibitory effect of high energy shock waves and radiotherapy in vitro. The influence of electrode shape on the performance of electrohydraulic lithotripters. Evaluation of patient controlled sedation and analgesia for ESWL. Treatment of ureteral calculi with an 8.3F disposable shaft rigid ureteroscope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1