Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in situ treatment for ureteral stones.

M D'Hallewin, L Baert
{"title":"Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in situ treatment for ureteral stones.","authors":"M D'Hallewin,&nbsp;L Baert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three hundred and sixteen patients with ureteral stones were treated in situ (without retrograde stone manipulation) with and without stent bypass (DJ stent, ureteral catheter). Results were generally better with stent bypass, but only marginally so for stones larger than 10 mm in diameter. Regardless of whether or not the ureter was stented, lower ureteral stones were more difficult to fragment than upper ureteral stones and pre-sacral stones did not respond well to in situ treatment. We observed that evaluation of stone disintegration and fragment evacuation could only be properly assessed after approximately 3 weeks post-ESWL.</p>","PeriodicalId":80212,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","volume":"3 1","pages":"45-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three hundred and sixteen patients with ureteral stones were treated in situ (without retrograde stone manipulation) with and without stent bypass (DJ stent, ureteral catheter). Results were generally better with stent bypass, but only marginally so for stones larger than 10 mm in diameter. Regardless of whether or not the ureter was stented, lower ureteral stones were more difficult to fragment than upper ureteral stones and pre-sacral stones did not respond well to in situ treatment. We observed that evaluation of stone disintegration and fragment evacuation could only be properly assessed after approximately 3 weeks post-ESWL.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外冲击波碎石原位治疗输尿管结石。
本文对316例输尿管结石患者进行原位治疗(无逆行结石手法),有或无支架旁路(DJ支架、输尿管导管)。支架搭桥术的效果一般较好,但对于直径大于10mm的结石效果稍好。无论输尿管是否植入支架,下输尿管结石比上输尿管结石更难破碎,骶骨前结石对原位治疗反应不佳。我们观察到,只有在eswl后约3周才能正确评估结石崩解和碎片排出情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The value of sonography in the assessment of cholecystolithotripsy. Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of salivary gland stones: an in vitro feasibility study. Piezoelectric lithotripsy monotherapy for partial or total staghorn lithiasis and calculi larger than thirty millimeters. Gallstone imaging: getting the most out of the oral cholecystogram. Urologic experience with the Dornier multipurpose lithotripter MPL 9000.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1