Gallstone lithotripsy: early American results and the new reality.

J R Adwers
{"title":"Gallstone lithotripsy: early American results and the new reality.","authors":"J R Adwers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early comparative data is now available from several different American Gallstone Lithotripsy, (\"GSL\") trials (Technomed, Dornier, and Medstone). While the 6-month gallbladder clearance results appear to be remarkably similar (36%-43% in less than 20-mm solitary stones), they do not appear to match the results obtained by the Munich group in their first 175 patients (63% clearance at 4-8 months). We review the currently available American data and describe our on-going national clinical trial with the Technomed Sonolith 3000 investigation. In this trial, patients are randomized to lithotripsy plus ursodiol (Actigall,¿ Ciba Geigy), or lithotripsy alone to determine the effect of oral bile salts on the gallbladder fragment clearance rate. To date, the early success rate is clearly better in the GSL plus ursodiol arm. Following one or two lithotripsy sessions, 62.1% of patients with solitary stones, 5-20 mm in size, have had fragmentation to 7 mm or less. In the same group, 39.1% of gallbladders are clear at 6 months. While the 6-month gallbladder clearance rate appears to be a reliable indicator of eventual gallbladder status it should not be regarded as the end point of therapy and it clearly does not represent the final efficacy rate for gallstone lithotripsy. A review of the results obtained from on-going American IDE trials is compared with the published German results using GSL and combination oral dissolution therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":80212,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","volume":"2 3","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of lithotripsy & stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early comparative data is now available from several different American Gallstone Lithotripsy, ("GSL") trials (Technomed, Dornier, and Medstone). While the 6-month gallbladder clearance results appear to be remarkably similar (36%-43% in less than 20-mm solitary stones), they do not appear to match the results obtained by the Munich group in their first 175 patients (63% clearance at 4-8 months). We review the currently available American data and describe our on-going national clinical trial with the Technomed Sonolith 3000 investigation. In this trial, patients are randomized to lithotripsy plus ursodiol (Actigall,¿ Ciba Geigy), or lithotripsy alone to determine the effect of oral bile salts on the gallbladder fragment clearance rate. To date, the early success rate is clearly better in the GSL plus ursodiol arm. Following one or two lithotripsy sessions, 62.1% of patients with solitary stones, 5-20 mm in size, have had fragmentation to 7 mm or less. In the same group, 39.1% of gallbladders are clear at 6 months. While the 6-month gallbladder clearance rate appears to be a reliable indicator of eventual gallbladder status it should not be regarded as the end point of therapy and it clearly does not represent the final efficacy rate for gallstone lithotripsy. A review of the results obtained from on-going American IDE trials is compared with the published German results using GSL and combination oral dissolution therapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆结石碎石术:早期美国的结果和新的现实。
早期的比较数据现在可以从几个不同的美国胆结石碎石术(“GSL”)试验(Technomed、Dornier和Medstone)中获得。虽然6个月的胆囊清除率结果似乎非常相似(小于20毫米的孤立结石为36%-43%),但它们似乎与慕尼黑组在其前175名患者中获得的结果不一致(4-8个月清除率为63%)。我们回顾了目前可获得的美国数据,并描述了我们正在进行的国家临床试验与Technomed Sonolith 3000调查。在本试验中,患者被随机分为碎石加熊二醇(Actigall,¿Ciba Geigy)或单独碎石组,以确定口服胆盐对胆囊碎片清除率的影响。迄今为止,GSL加乌索二醇组的早期成功率明显更高。经过一到两次碎石术,62.1%的5- 20mm的孤立性结石患者碎裂至7mm或更小。在同一组中,39.1%的胆囊在6个月时是透明的。虽然6个月胆囊清除率似乎是最终胆囊状态的可靠指标,但它不应被视为治疗的终点,也显然不能代表胆结石碎石术的最终有效率。对正在进行的美国IDE试验结果的回顾与德国发表的使用GSL和联合口服溶出剂治疗的结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The value of sonography in the assessment of cholecystolithotripsy. Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of salivary gland stones: an in vitro feasibility study. Piezoelectric lithotripsy monotherapy for partial or total staghorn lithiasis and calculi larger than thirty millimeters. Gallstone imaging: getting the most out of the oral cholecystogram. Urologic experience with the Dornier multipurpose lithotripter MPL 9000.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1