Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the thoracolumbar spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord injured patients.

Contemporary orthopaedics Pub Date : 1994-11-01
S Rao, R L Waters, K Badani, I Sie, R H Adkins
{"title":"Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the thoracolumbar spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord injured patients.","authors":"S Rao,&nbsp;R L Waters,&nbsp;K Badani,&nbsp;I Sie,&nbsp;R H Adkins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cross-sectional area and the sagittal and transverse diameters of the spinal canal at the thoracolumbar junction were measured using high resolution thin-section computerized tomography images in 15 control subjects and 28 patients with traumatic injury to the spinal cord at the thoracolumbar junction. No significant difference between the control and study groups was found with regard to any of the three measures taken. With the exception of the sagittal canal diameter for the first lumbar vertebra, all the mean values were higher for the spinal cord injured group. The ratio of the sagittal to transverse diameter was larger for the control group; however, this difference also was not significant. These findings suggest no significant differences in the dimensions and shape of the canal at the thoracolumbar region between the spinal cord injured and control groups. In contrast to the cervical spinal canal, there appears to be no correlation between the spinal cord injury and the dimensions of the thoracolumbar spinal canal.</p>","PeriodicalId":79846,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary orthopaedics","volume":"29 5","pages":"329-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cross-sectional area and the sagittal and transverse diameters of the spinal canal at the thoracolumbar junction were measured using high resolution thin-section computerized tomography images in 15 control subjects and 28 patients with traumatic injury to the spinal cord at the thoracolumbar junction. No significant difference between the control and study groups was found with regard to any of the three measures taken. With the exception of the sagittal canal diameter for the first lumbar vertebra, all the mean values were higher for the spinal cord injured group. The ratio of the sagittal to transverse diameter was larger for the control group; however, this difference also was not significant. These findings suggest no significant differences in the dimensions and shape of the canal at the thoracolumbar region between the spinal cord injured and control groups. In contrast to the cervical spinal canal, there appears to be no correlation between the spinal cord injury and the dimensions of the thoracolumbar spinal canal.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常对照与脊髓损伤患者胸腰椎计算机断层参数的比较。
采用高分辨率薄层计算机断层成像技术测量了15例对照组和28例胸腰段连接处脊髓创伤性损伤患者的椎管横截面积、矢状径和横径。在采取的三种措施中,对照组和研究组之间没有发现显著差异。除第一腰椎矢状管直径外,脊髓损伤组的平均值均较高。对照组矢状径与横径之比较大;然而,这种差异也不显著。这些结果表明,在胸腰段椎管的大小和形状在脊髓损伤组和对照组之间没有显著差异。与颈椎管相比,脊髓损伤与胸腰椎管的尺寸似乎没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of supracondylar fractures proximal to total knee arthroplasty with the GSH supracondylar nail. Allograft safety: viral inactivation with bone demineralization. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: report of a series of 23 patients. Difficulty in removal of the distal locking device of the Brooker-Wills tibial nail. Symposium: management of infections in total joint replacements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1