Gynaecology: the experience of patients referred to NHS and private clinics.

Health trends Pub Date : 1995-01-01
A Coulter, V Peto, H Doll
{"title":"Gynaecology: the experience of patients referred to NHS and private clinics.","authors":"A Coulter,&nbsp;V Peto,&nbsp;H Doll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cohort study compared the experience of patients seeking treatment for menorrhagia who were referred to National Health Service (NHS) or private clinics. Two-hundred and nine patients in 73 general practices in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire and Oxfordshire were recruited by their general practitioners and followed-up with questionnaires at nine months and 18 months after entry to the study. One hundred and fifty patients were referred to NHS clinics and 59 to private clinics; there were no significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of symptom severity, reason for referral or treatment received. Patients who went to private clinics were more likely to report active participation in decisions about their care (p < 0.05 after adjustment for age and educational status), and were slightly more likely to be satisfied with the care they had received. The treatment decisions made in gynaecological clinics in the NHS and private sector were similar, but the decision-making styles appeared to be different. Private patients were more likely to participate in treatment decisions than NHS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"27 2","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cohort study compared the experience of patients seeking treatment for menorrhagia who were referred to National Health Service (NHS) or private clinics. Two-hundred and nine patients in 73 general practices in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire and Oxfordshire were recruited by their general practitioners and followed-up with questionnaires at nine months and 18 months after entry to the study. One hundred and fifty patients were referred to NHS clinics and 59 to private clinics; there were no significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of symptom severity, reason for referral or treatment received. Patients who went to private clinics were more likely to report active participation in decisions about their care (p < 0.05 after adjustment for age and educational status), and were slightly more likely to be satisfied with the care they had received. The treatment decisions made in gynaecological clinics in the NHS and private sector were similar, but the decision-making styles appeared to be different. Private patients were more likely to participate in treatment decisions than NHS patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科:病人转介到国民保健服务和私人诊所的经验。
本队列研究比较了在国家卫生服务(NHS)或私人诊所寻求月经过多治疗的患者的经验。来自伯克郡、白金汉郡、北安普敦郡和牛津郡73家全科诊所的209名患者被他们的全科医生招募,并在进入研究的9个月和18个月后进行问卷调查。150名患者被转介到NHS诊所,59名患者被转介到私人诊所;两组患者在症状严重程度、转诊原因或接受治疗方面无显著差异。去私人诊所的患者更有可能报告积极参与他们的护理决策(调整年龄和教育状况后p < 0.05),并且更有可能对他们所接受的护理感到满意。在NHS和私营部门妇科诊所的治疗决策是相似的,但决策风格似乎是不同的。私人患者比NHS患者更有可能参与治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variations in clinical experience of pre-registration house officers: the effect of London. Job satisfaction and health of house officers in the West Midlands. Use of Office of Population Censuses and Surveys records in medical research and clinical audit. The demand for primary dental care at a dental teaching hospital, 1989 and 1993. General hospital services for attempted suicide patients: a survey in one region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1