Parent satisfaction with children's mental health services in a children's mental health managed care demonstration.

C A Heflinger, S E Sonnichsen, A M Brannan
{"title":"Parent satisfaction with children's mental health services in a children's mental health managed care demonstration.","authors":"C A Heflinger,&nbsp;S E Sonnichsen,&nbsp;A M Brannan","doi":"10.1007/BF02518644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents findings from a quasi-experiment that included the use of satisfaction scales to compare parent's satisfaction with the services their children received through two different mental health care delivery systems. Satisfaction with the following three types of service were compared: (1) intake assessment during the admission process to any service setting, (2) outpatient services, and (3) residential treatment including inpatient hospitalization and residential treatment centers (RTCs). Additionally, satisfaction with several areas of care (e.g., access, treatment process, therapist relationship, parent and family services, discharge and transition planning), as well as global satisfaction, was assessed. In general, parents whose children received services through an innovative continuum of care system reported significantly higher satisfaction with intake assessment and outpatient services than did parents whose children received care in a traditional fee-for-service system. Fewer differences were found in satisfaction with residential services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02518644","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This article presents findings from a quasi-experiment that included the use of satisfaction scales to compare parent's satisfaction with the services their children received through two different mental health care delivery systems. Satisfaction with the following three types of service were compared: (1) intake assessment during the admission process to any service setting, (2) outpatient services, and (3) residential treatment including inpatient hospitalization and residential treatment centers (RTCs). Additionally, satisfaction with several areas of care (e.g., access, treatment process, therapist relationship, parent and family services, discharge and transition planning), as well as global satisfaction, was assessed. In general, parents whose children received services through an innovative continuum of care system reported significantly higher satisfaction with intake assessment and outpatient services than did parents whose children received care in a traditional fee-for-service system. Fewer differences were found in satisfaction with residential services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童心理健康管理护理示范中家长对儿童心理健康服务的满意度。
本文介绍了一项准实验的结果,该实验包括使用满意度量表来比较父母对他们的孩子通过两种不同的精神卫生保健提供系统所获得的服务的满意度。对以下三种服务的满意度进行比较:(1)在任何服务设置的入院过程中的摄入评估,(2)门诊服务,以及(3)住院治疗,包括住院和住院治疗中心(rtc)。此外,对几个护理领域的满意度(例如,获取、治疗过程、治疗师关系、父母和家庭服务、出院和过渡计划)以及总体满意度进行了评估。总的来说,孩子通过创新的连续护理系统接受服务的父母对入院评估和门诊服务的满意度明显高于孩子接受传统收费服务系统的父母。对住宿服务的满意度差异较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Editors’ note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1