Psychometric properties of a decision-support tool for the era of managed care.

W M Glazer, G V Gray
{"title":"Psychometric properties of a decision-support tool for the era of managed care.","authors":"W M Glazer,&nbsp;G V Gray","doi":"10.1007/BF02519113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports psychometric properties of a decision-support scale designed to quantify the decision-making process for allocating psychiatric care. The authors developed a scale to evaluate the level of care needed for patients requiring psychiatric treatment in a health maintenance organization (HMO) setting. This study examines the reliability and validity of that scale by measuring interrater agreement among utilization reviewers from the HMO and between those reviewers and the clinicians who evaluated the patients directly. Agreement (kappa) among the five clinical raters acting in a utilization review capacity on dimensions of the scale ranged from .71 to .98. Kappas for agreement between the treatment intensity proposed by the reviewer/rater and used by the treating clinician were .41, .38, .40, .35, .36, and .39, respectively. The scale is reliable in the hands of trained personnel. Although there were important differences between clinicians' ratings and those of utilization review raters, these differences do not suggest that use of the scale would limit patient access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02519113","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article reports psychometric properties of a decision-support scale designed to quantify the decision-making process for allocating psychiatric care. The authors developed a scale to evaluate the level of care needed for patients requiring psychiatric treatment in a health maintenance organization (HMO) setting. This study examines the reliability and validity of that scale by measuring interrater agreement among utilization reviewers from the HMO and between those reviewers and the clinicians who evaluated the patients directly. Agreement (kappa) among the five clinical raters acting in a utilization review capacity on dimensions of the scale ranged from .71 to .98. Kappas for agreement between the treatment intensity proposed by the reviewer/rater and used by the treating clinician were .41, .38, .40, .35, .36, and .39, respectively. The scale is reliable in the hands of trained personnel. Although there were important differences between clinicians' ratings and those of utilization review raters, these differences do not suggest that use of the scale would limit patient access to care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理式医疗时代决策支持工具的心理测量特性。
本文报告了一个决策支持量表的心理测量特性,该量表旨在量化分配精神科护理的决策过程。作者开发了一个量表来评估在健康维护组织(HMO)环境中需要精神治疗的患者所需的护理水平。本研究通过测量来自HMO的使用评估者之间以及这些评估者与直接评估患者的临床医生之间的解释者一致性来检验该量表的信度和效度。五个临床评分者在使用评估能力方面的一致性(kappa)范围从0.71到0.98。审稿人/评分者建议的治疗强度与治疗临床医生使用的治疗强度的一致性kappa分别为0.41、0.38、0.40、0.35、0.36和0.39。秤在训练有素的人员手中是可靠的。尽管临床医生的评分与使用评估评分者之间存在重要差异,但这些差异并不表明使用该量表会限制患者获得护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Appreciation to reviewers Editors’ note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1