Piloting short workshops on the critical appraisal of reviews.

Health trends Pub Date : 1995-01-01
R Milne, A Donald, L Chambers
{"title":"Piloting short workshops on the critical appraisal of reviews.","authors":"R Milne,&nbsp;A Donald,&nbsp;L Chambers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes a pilot programme of short workshops on the critical appraisal of review articles. The twelve workshops, which ran in various parts of the United Kingdom during 1992 and 1993, lasted either one or two half-days, and consisted of a mixture of large-group sessions and critical appraisal in small groups of a systematic review. The 274 participants came from varied backgrounds, though chiefly in public health and purchasing. The workshops were well received and were oversubscribed. Participants reported that they found them useful and that they raised their awareness of the place of evidence about effectiveness in decision-making. The challenge now is to evaluate the impact of such workshops more rigorously.</p>","PeriodicalId":79616,"journal":{"name":"Health trends","volume":"27 4","pages":"120-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes a pilot programme of short workshops on the critical appraisal of review articles. The twelve workshops, which ran in various parts of the United Kingdom during 1992 and 1993, lasted either one or two half-days, and consisted of a mixture of large-group sessions and critical appraisal in small groups of a systematic review. The 274 participants came from varied backgrounds, though chiefly in public health and purchasing. The workshops were well received and were oversubscribed. Participants reported that they found them useful and that they raised their awareness of the place of evidence about effectiveness in decision-making. The challenge now is to evaluate the impact of such workshops more rigorously.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试行关于审查的关键评价的短期讲习班。
本文描述了一项关于批判性评价评论文章的短期讲习班的试点方案。1992年和1993年期间在联合王国不同地区举办的12个讲习班持续了一天或两个半天,包括大小组会议和系统审查小组的关键评价。274名参与者来自不同的背景,但主要是在公共卫生和采购领域。工作坊反响良好,超额认购。与会者报告说,他们发现这些报告很有用,并且提高了他们对证据在决策效力方面的地位的认识。现在的挑战是更严格地评估这些讲习班的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variations in clinical experience of pre-registration house officers: the effect of London. Job satisfaction and health of house officers in the West Midlands. Use of Office of Population Censuses and Surveys records in medical research and clinical audit. The demand for primary dental care at a dental teaching hospital, 1989 and 1993. General hospital services for attempted suicide patients: a survey in one region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1