The PSO bandwagon.

Integrated healthcare report Pub Date : 1998-08-01
J F Pogue
{"title":"The PSO bandwagon.","authors":"J F Pogue","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In summary, if an organization is thinking of putting together a PSO they should do a thorough due diligence with a focus on their physician interest and competencies. The feasibility needs to be realistic. Some physician organizations we've talked with aren't even considering a PSO. They have too many other fish to fry. Not only that, there is a natural reluctance to dive into a pool without a bottom. Medicare can be counted on to keep changing the rules. Without a set of rules you can count on, why should you engage in the game? It's facinating to watch HCFA staff engaged in their intramural, camp-fire deliberations. They sit around in a circle and ask \"what if?\" If we reward providers for taking care of sick people, will they simply recruit more sick people? Think about that question for a minute. Isn't there something twisted in this? To be sure, a PSO is not for the naive or faint of heart. To be realistic, budget a minimum of 3 years to break even. If you decide to go ahead with a PSO, the tuition you pay today for the learning curve should benefit you in the years to come. Plan for the best. Prepare for the worst. With opportunity comes risk. Find a visionary to lead this new venture. Only those who see the invisible, can do the impossible.</p>","PeriodicalId":79647,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare report","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In summary, if an organization is thinking of putting together a PSO they should do a thorough due diligence with a focus on their physician interest and competencies. The feasibility needs to be realistic. Some physician organizations we've talked with aren't even considering a PSO. They have too many other fish to fry. Not only that, there is a natural reluctance to dive into a pool without a bottom. Medicare can be counted on to keep changing the rules. Without a set of rules you can count on, why should you engage in the game? It's facinating to watch HCFA staff engaged in their intramural, camp-fire deliberations. They sit around in a circle and ask "what if?" If we reward providers for taking care of sick people, will they simply recruit more sick people? Think about that question for a minute. Isn't there something twisted in this? To be sure, a PSO is not for the naive or faint of heart. To be realistic, budget a minimum of 3 years to break even. If you decide to go ahead with a PSO, the tuition you pay today for the learning curve should benefit you in the years to come. Plan for the best. Prepare for the worst. With opportunity comes risk. Find a visionary to lead this new venture. Only those who see the invisible, can do the impossible.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PSO的潮流。
总之,如果一个组织正在考虑组建一个PSO,他们应该做一个彻底的尽职调查,重点关注他们的医生的兴趣和能力。可行性需要是现实的。我们接触过的一些医生组织甚至不考虑PSO。他们有太多别的事要做。不仅如此,人们自然不愿跳进没有底的池子里。医疗保险可以指望不断改变规则。如果没有一套你可以依赖的规则,你为什么要参与游戏?看着HCFA的员工参与他们内部的篝火讨论是很有趣的。他们围坐成一圈,问“如果……会怎么样?”如果我们奖励照顾病人的提供者,他们会不会招募更多的病人?思考一下这个问题。这不是有些扭曲吗?可以肯定的是,PSO不适合天真或胆小的人。实事求是地说,预算至少3年才能收支平衡。如果你决定继续攻读PSO,你今天为学习曲线支付的学费将在未来的几年里让你受益。做最好的打算。做最坏的打算。机遇伴随着风险。找一个有远见的人来领导这次新冒险。只有看到看不见的人,才能做到不可能的事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
California journal. Technology Part III: exploiting the opportunities. Technology. Part II: New opportunities for health care? Technology part 1: the Internet--opportunities & threats. Profile: Baptist Health System, Birmingham.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1