Overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters and the development of nosocomial urinary tract infections.

M A Gardam, B Amihod, P Orenstein, N Consolacion, M A Miller
{"title":"Overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters and the development of nosocomial urinary tract infections.","authors":"M A Gardam,&nbsp;B Amihod,&nbsp;P Orenstein,&nbsp;N Consolacion,&nbsp;M A Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters in the emergency department on the development of nosocomial urinary tract infection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>638-bed tertiary-care hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>118 consecutive medical and surgical admissions from the emergency department collected over 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Catheterized patients were assessed. The completeness of documentation relating to catheter insertion and two outcomes were measured: asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 (20.3%) had catheters inserted, of whom 12 (50%) were catheterized for justifiable indications. Positive urine cultures were found in 10 of the catheterized patients (42%), 5 of whom fulfilled the definition for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Three of the five infections occurred in patients for whom catheterization was not justifiable. An order was written for catheter insertion in 62.5% of charts, while the rationale for catheterization was documented in 16.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many nosocomial urinary tract infections are due to the inappropriate placement of indwelling urinary catheters in the emergency department. The prevention of these infections should begin with restricting catheterization to those patients for whom it is appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"6 3","pages":"99-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of the overutilization of indwelling urinary catheters in the emergency department on the development of nosocomial urinary tract infection.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: 638-bed tertiary-care hospital.

Patients: 118 consecutive medical and surgical admissions from the emergency department collected over 3 weeks.

Intervention: Catheterized patients were assessed. The completeness of documentation relating to catheter insertion and two outcomes were measured: asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection.

Results: 24 (20.3%) had catheters inserted, of whom 12 (50%) were catheterized for justifiable indications. Positive urine cultures were found in 10 of the catheterized patients (42%), 5 of whom fulfilled the definition for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Three of the five infections occurred in patients for whom catheterization was not justifiable. An order was written for catheter insertion in 62.5% of charts, while the rationale for catheterization was documented in 16.7%.

Conclusions: Many nosocomial urinary tract infections are due to the inappropriate placement of indwelling urinary catheters in the emergency department. The prevention of these infections should begin with restricting catheterization to those patients for whom it is appropriate.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
留置导尿管的过度使用与院内尿路感染的发生。
目的:探讨急诊科留置导尿管过度使用对院内尿路感染发生的影响。设计:前瞻性队列研究。环境:拥有638张床位的三级医院。患者:3周内收集的118例急诊科连续内科和外科住院患者。干预:对置管患者进行评估。测量了与导管插入和两种结果相关的文献的完整性:无症状细菌尿和尿路感染。结果:24例(20.3%)置管,其中12例(50%)指征合理。尿培养阳性10例(42%),其中5例符合导尿管相关尿路感染的定义。5例感染中有3例发生在导管置入不合理的患者中。62.5%的病历记录了置管指令,16.7%的病历记录了置管理由。结论:许多院内尿路感染是由于急诊科留置导尿管放置不当引起的。预防这些感染应从限制对那些适合的患者插管开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of clinical indicators for performance measurement of health care quality: a cautionary note. An audit of psychiatric case notes in relation to antipsychotic medication and information giving. Clinical governance: its origins and its foundations. Clinical effectiveness on an acute in-patient psychiatric unit. Clinical governance and clinical documentation: still a long way to go?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1