Inspector General wins round two of Hanlester Case.

The Medical staff counselor Pub Date : 1992-01-01
J C Dechene
{"title":"Inspector General wins round two of Hanlester Case.","authors":"J C Dechene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The decision of the HHS Departmental Appeals Board Appellate Division in Inspector General v. Hanlester Network provides guidance as to the aspects of joint ventures that pose fraud and abuse concerns by listing the factors that may indicate an improper purpose. Together with the fraud and abuse safe harbors, the decision helps identify the pitfalls associated with physician investment in suspect joint ventures. This article analyzes the latest Hanlester decision, forecasts the future of joint venturing after Hanlester and the safe harbors, and offers some guidance to potential investors in light of these developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":79747,"journal":{"name":"The Medical staff counselor","volume":"6 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical staff counselor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision of the HHS Departmental Appeals Board Appellate Division in Inspector General v. Hanlester Network provides guidance as to the aspects of joint ventures that pose fraud and abuse concerns by listing the factors that may indicate an improper purpose. Together with the fraud and abuse safe harbors, the decision helps identify the pitfalls associated with physician investment in suspect joint ventures. This article analyzes the latest Hanlester decision, forecasts the future of joint venturing after Hanlester and the safe harbors, and offers some guidance to potential investors in light of these developments.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总检察长赢了汉莱斯特案的第二轮。
卫生与公众服务部上诉委员会上诉司在“监察长诉汉莱斯特网络案”中作出的决定列出了可能表明不正当目的的因素,为合资企业中存在欺诈和滥用问题的方面提供了指导。与欺诈和滥用安全港一起,该决定有助于识别与医生投资可疑合资企业相关的陷阱。本文分析了汉莱斯特的最新决定,预测了汉莱斯特之后合资企业的未来和安全港,并根据这些发展为潜在投资者提供了一些指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health care reform and the practice of medicine. The evolution of medical staff credentialing. Physicians' tort liability for communications relating to AIDS. Antitrust pitfalls in outpatient services. Preparing adequate medical staff committee minutes: tips for handling a difficult task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1