Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups.

Computers in nursing Pub Date : 1999-03-01
P Klemm, M Hurst, S L Dearholt, S R Trone
{"title":"Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups.","authors":"P Klemm,&nbsp;M Hurst,&nbsp;S L Dearholt,&nbsp;S R Trone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of community-based cancer support groups (CSGs) in helping people cope with cancer is well known. Recently, online CSGs have become a viable alternative to traditional CSGs. The purposes of this study were to determine if categories of responses on Internet cancer support groups (ICSGs) differ when the majority of the participants were of a single gender, and whether response categories seen on gender-specific ICSGs were different than those on ICSGs used equally by men and women. A line-by-line analysis of postings on prostate, breast, and mixed ICSGs were analyzed and responses categorized. Four categories (information giving/seeking; encouragement/support; personal opinion; and personal experience) accounted for approximately 80% of responses across the groups. Information giving/seeking was ranked first in the prostate group, and personal experience took priority in the breast group. Men were more than twice as likely to give information and women more than twice as likely to give encouragement and support. One category (prayer), identified in the mixed group, was lacking in the prostate and breast groups, and an activism category was added to the prostate group. Categorical responses differed by gender (chi 2 = 79.40, P < .0001). Attention should be given to facilitating the entry of underserved groups into ICSGs. Future research should explore the relationship between ICSG membership and variables such as depression, survival time, and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":77082,"journal":{"name":"Computers in nursing","volume":"17 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of community-based cancer support groups (CSGs) in helping people cope with cancer is well known. Recently, online CSGs have become a viable alternative to traditional CSGs. The purposes of this study were to determine if categories of responses on Internet cancer support groups (ICSGs) differ when the majority of the participants were of a single gender, and whether response categories seen on gender-specific ICSGs were different than those on ICSGs used equally by men and women. A line-by-line analysis of postings on prostate, breast, and mixed ICSGs were analyzed and responses categorized. Four categories (information giving/seeking; encouragement/support; personal opinion; and personal experience) accounted for approximately 80% of responses across the groups. Information giving/seeking was ranked first in the prostate group, and personal experience took priority in the breast group. Men were more than twice as likely to give information and women more than twice as likely to give encouragement and support. One category (prayer), identified in the mixed group, was lacking in the prostate and breast groups, and an activism category was added to the prostate group. Categorical responses differed by gender (chi 2 = 79.40, P < .0001). Attention should be given to facilitating the entry of underserved groups into ICSGs. Future research should explore the relationship between ICSG membership and variables such as depression, survival time, and quality of life.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互联网癌症支持团体的性别差异。
社区癌症支持团体(csg)在帮助人们应对癌症方面的作用是众所周知的。最近,在线csg已经成为传统csg的可行选择。本研究的目的是确定当大多数参与者为单一性别时,互联网癌症支持小组(ICSGs)的反应类别是否不同,以及性别特异性ICSGs的反应类别是否与男女平等使用的ICSGs不同。对前列腺癌、乳腺癌和混合性ICSGs的帖子进行逐行分析,并对回复进行分类。四类(信息提供/寻求;鼓励和支持;个人意见;个人经历)占了整个小组回答的大约80%。在前列腺组中,信息的提供/寻求是第一位的,而在乳腺组中,个人经验是第一位的。男性提供信息的可能性是女性的两倍多,而女性给予鼓励和支持的可能性是女性的两倍多。在混合组中发现的一个类别(祈祷)在前列腺组和乳腺组中缺乏,在前列腺组中增加了一个行动主义类别。分类反应因性别而异(chi 2 = 79.40, P < 0.0001)。应注意便利服务不足的群体加入国际支助小组。未来的研究应探讨ICSG成员与抑郁、生存时间和生活质量等变量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
World Health Organization and top publishers announce breakthrough on developing countries' access to leading biomedical journals. Developing technology applications for intervention research: a case study. The informatics nurse specialist as change agent. Application of innovation-diffusion theory. Formative evaluation of a computer-assisted learning program in pharmacology for nursing students. The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching nursing students about congenital heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1