[INSERM-FNCLCC collective expertise. Recommendations for medical management of women with genetic risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer].

Annales de genetique Pub Date : 1999-01-01
F Eisinger, N Alby, A Bremond, J Dauplat, M Espié, P Janiaud, F Kuttenn, J P Lebrun, J P Lefranc, J Pierret, H Sobol, D Stoppa-Lyonnet, D Thouvenin, H Tristant, J Feingold
{"title":"[INSERM-FNCLCC collective expertise. Recommendations for medical management of women with genetic risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer].","authors":"F Eisinger,&nbsp;N Alby,&nbsp;A Bremond,&nbsp;J Dauplat,&nbsp;M Espié,&nbsp;P Janiaud,&nbsp;F Kuttenn,&nbsp;J P Lebrun,&nbsp;J P Lefranc,&nbsp;J Pierret,&nbsp;H Sobol,&nbsp;D Stoppa-Lyonnet,&nbsp;D Thouvenin,&nbsp;H Tristant,&nbsp;J Feingold","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancer are inherited, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite the uncertainty in the management of women gene carriers, consensus guidelines were defined to assist practitioners', and patients' decisions about the health care decisions to be made.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The Ad Hoc Committee consisted of 14 experts designated by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research. They all attended eleven workshops at which a systematic analytical review of more than 3500 articles was carried out. Five additional experts critically analysed the first version of the report. CRITERIA AND DECISION PROCESS: Two thresholds were defined on a probability scale giving the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, to serve as a means of deciding as whether an intervention is worthwhile. The first threshold is that above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended; the second is that under which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a each by case basis. STRATEGIES ANALYZED: About breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. About ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy.</p><p><strong>Main conclusions: </strong>With each strategy the following points were dealt with; the information to be delivered to the Consultant, the procedure and the indications. In addition, the Committee's opinion about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening is that population-based or even large scale implementation are not justified. Although no scientific evidence is available, the Committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and involvement in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7908,"journal":{"name":"Annales de genetique","volume":"42 1","pages":"51-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de genetique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancer are inherited, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite the uncertainty in the management of women gene carriers, consensus guidelines were defined to assist practitioners', and patients' decisions about the health care decisions to be made.

Methodology: The Ad Hoc Committee consisted of 14 experts designated by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research. They all attended eleven workshops at which a systematic analytical review of more than 3500 articles was carried out. Five additional experts critically analysed the first version of the report. CRITERIA AND DECISION PROCESS: Two thresholds were defined on a probability scale giving the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, to serve as a means of deciding as whether an intervention is worthwhile. The first threshold is that above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended; the second is that under which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a each by case basis. STRATEGIES ANALYZED: About breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. About ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy.

Main conclusions: With each strategy the following points were dealt with; the information to be delivered to the Consultant, the procedure and the indications. In addition, the Committee's opinion about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening is that population-based or even large scale implementation are not justified. Although no scientific evidence is available, the Committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and involvement in clinical trials.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[INSERM-FNCLCC集体专业知识]有患乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌遗传风险妇女的医疗管理建议。
背景:近10%的乳腺癌和卵巢癌是遗传性的,大多数与BRCA1和BRCA2种系突变有关。尽管在妇女基因携带者的管理的不确定性,共识的指导方针被定义,以协助医生和病人的卫生保健决策作出决定。方法:特设委员会由法国国家卫生和医学研究所指定的14名专家组成。他们都参加了11个研讨会,对3500多篇文章进行了系统的分析审查。另外五名专家对第一版报告进行了批判性分析。标准和决策过程:在概率尺度上定义了两个阈值,给出了患乳腺癌或卵巢癌的风险,作为决定干预是否值得的手段。第一个阈值是可以设想或建议采取干预措施的阈值;第二种是排除干预的标准;在两者之间,必须根据具体情况做出决定。分析策略:关于乳腺癌:1)激素干预;2)一级预防(饮食、计划生育和化学预防);3)筛查(乳房自检、临床乳房检查、肿瘤标志物、影像学检查);4)预防性乳房切除术。关于卵巢癌:1)激素刺激;2)筛查(临床筛查、超声及肿瘤标志物);3)预防性卵巢切除术。主要结论:每个策略处理以下几点;应交付给顾问的信息、程序和适应症。此外,委员会关于BRCA1和BRCA2突变筛查的意见是,以人群为基础甚至大规模实施是不合理的。虽然没有科学证据,但委员会认为,具体的管理是必不可少的,并主张使用明确和评估的程序,并参与临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts of the 4th European Cytogenetics Conference. Bologna, Italy, September 6-9, 2003. A novel translocation, t(9;21)(q13;q22) rearranging the RUNX1 gene in acute myelomonocytic leukemia. Dysmorphic Syndromes And Constitutional Diseases Of The Skeleton Rhabdomyosarcoma: cytogenetics of five cases using fine-needle aspiration samples and review of the literature. Linkage disequilibrium and founder effect analysis of the NF1 gene in French Canadians from the Quebec population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1