Health planning in the united states: Where we stand today

Harry P. Cain II, Helen N. Darling (Thornberry)
{"title":"Health planning in the united states: Where we stand today","authors":"Harry P. Cain II,&nbsp;Helen N. Darling (Thornberry)","doi":"10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80003-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports on the status of the implementation of the national health planning program mandated by Congress in the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-641). The law created and financed a two-tiered planning network of more than 260 local and state planning agencies. The paper gives a very brief history of previous efforts in health planning and describes some of the environmental factors — rampant cost inflation and proliferation and redundancy of high cost technology and facilities — which triggered interest in controlling capital investment in the health sector.</p><p>The major structural features of the statute and the progress made by 1977 in constructing the program are described. The rationale and the requirements related to particular Plan documents are explained, as are the Certificate of Need law provisions and Appropriateness Review.</p><p>The authors argue that this program is different from previous planning efforts in several fundamental respects including who the major actors are, the importance given to an empirical, population-based, systems approach to planning, the availability of technical assistance and the emphasis on plan implementation.</p><p>While there is evidence of progress in health planning, some persistent policy problems such as unrealistically high expectations, the inadequacy of the knowledge base, insufficient time and patience to allow for agency maturation, conflicts in governance, assuring public accountability, and the desirability of further regulation of the health industry still remain unresolved. The authors conclude that, compared to the apparent alternatives, this health planning program is the best way to go and should succeed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 5-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(79)80003-X","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016522817980003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper reports on the status of the implementation of the national health planning program mandated by Congress in the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-641). The law created and financed a two-tiered planning network of more than 260 local and state planning agencies. The paper gives a very brief history of previous efforts in health planning and describes some of the environmental factors — rampant cost inflation and proliferation and redundancy of high cost technology and facilities — which triggered interest in controlling capital investment in the health sector.

The major structural features of the statute and the progress made by 1977 in constructing the program are described. The rationale and the requirements related to particular Plan documents are explained, as are the Certificate of Need law provisions and Appropriateness Review.

The authors argue that this program is different from previous planning efforts in several fundamental respects including who the major actors are, the importance given to an empirical, population-based, systems approach to planning, the availability of technical assistance and the emphasis on plan implementation.

While there is evidence of progress in health planning, some persistent policy problems such as unrealistically high expectations, the inadequacy of the knowledge base, insufficient time and patience to allow for agency maturation, conflicts in governance, assuring public accountability, and the desirability of further regulation of the health industry still remain unresolved. The authors conclude that, compared to the apparent alternatives, this health planning program is the best way to go and should succeed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的健康计划:我们今天的处境
本文报告了国会在1974年《国家卫生计划和资源开发法》(P.L. 93-641)中授权的国家卫生计划方案的实施情况。该法案创建并资助了一个由260多个地方和州规划机构组成的双层规划网络。这篇论文非常简要地介绍了以前在卫生规划方面所做的努力,并描述了一些环境因素——猖獗的成本膨胀以及高成本技术和设施的扩散和冗余——这些因素引发了人们对控制卫生部门资本投资的兴趣。描述了该法规的主要结构特征和1977年在构建程序方面取得的进展。解释了与特定规划文件有关的基本原理和要求,以及需求证书法律规定和适当性审查。作者认为,这个方案在几个基本方面不同于以前的规划工作,包括谁是主要的行动者、对经验的、基于人口的、系统的规划方法的重视、技术援助的可得性和对计划执行的强调。虽然有证据表明在卫生规划方面取得了进展,但一些持续存在的政策问题,如不切实际的高期望、知识库不足、没有足够的时间和耐心使机构成熟、治理方面的冲突、确保公共问责制以及对卫生行业进一步监管的必要性,仍未得到解决。作者得出结论,与其他明显的替代方案相比,这种健康计划方案是最好的方法,应该会成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contributors to this issue Role of education in preserving traditional cultures and as development factor The effects of implementation problems on certificate of need decisions in Illinois Preventive services: An educational or political issue? GMENAC report on U.S. physician manpower policies: Recommendations and reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1