National drug formularies: lessons from Latin America.

A A LeRoy, M L Morse
{"title":"National drug formularies: lessons from Latin America.","authors":"A A LeRoy,&nbsp;M L Morse","doi":"10.1177/009286158301700206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although pharmaceuticals comprise up to 40% of the health care budget in developing countries, the majority of the population does not have access to many of the essential drugs needed to treat prevalent diseases. This situation demands the development of a national formulary of essential drugs for the public sector. The approach used in developing countries is to select drugs of choice for the treatment of prevalent morbidities and avoid therapeutic duplication, unacceptably dangerous drugs, or drugs of unproven efficacy. Drugs are selected based on a review of the prevalent morbidities, health care worker training, patient characteristics, and efficacy/risk information resulting from scientifically sound studies. An added component to the formulary is the inclusion of concise, unbiased prescribing information for each drug selected. A number of product selection guidelines were proven to be effective in establishing and maintaining an essential drug formulary for developing countries. These guidelines include: 1. Selection of drugs with proven efficacy and acceptable risk; 2. Selection of minimum number of drugs needed to treat the prevalent diseases; 3. Inclusion of new products only if they are found to have distinct advantages over products currently in use; 4. Inclusion of combination products only when they provide true benefit over single ingredients; 5. Selection of drugs with clear \"drug of choice\" indications for prevalent diseases; 6. Evaluation of the administrative and cost impact of products; and 7. Selection of drugs with established high quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"17 2","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158301700206","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158301700206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although pharmaceuticals comprise up to 40% of the health care budget in developing countries, the majority of the population does not have access to many of the essential drugs needed to treat prevalent diseases. This situation demands the development of a national formulary of essential drugs for the public sector. The approach used in developing countries is to select drugs of choice for the treatment of prevalent morbidities and avoid therapeutic duplication, unacceptably dangerous drugs, or drugs of unproven efficacy. Drugs are selected based on a review of the prevalent morbidities, health care worker training, patient characteristics, and efficacy/risk information resulting from scientifically sound studies. An added component to the formulary is the inclusion of concise, unbiased prescribing information for each drug selected. A number of product selection guidelines were proven to be effective in establishing and maintaining an essential drug formulary for developing countries. These guidelines include: 1. Selection of drugs with proven efficacy and acceptable risk; 2. Selection of minimum number of drugs needed to treat the prevalent diseases; 3. Inclusion of new products only if they are found to have distinct advantages over products currently in use; 4. Inclusion of combination products only when they provide true benefit over single ingredients; 5. Selection of drugs with clear "drug of choice" indications for prevalent diseases; 6. Evaluation of the administrative and cost impact of products; and 7. Selection of drugs with established high quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家药物处方:来自拉丁美洲的经验教训。
虽然药品占发展中国家卫生保健预算的40%,但大多数人口无法获得治疗流行疾病所需的许多基本药物。这种情况要求为公共部门制定一套国家基本药物处方。发展中国家使用的方法是选择治疗流行疾病的首选药物,避免重复治疗、不可接受的危险药物或未经证实疗效的药物。药物的选择是基于对流行发病率、卫生保健工作者培训、患者特征和科学可靠研究得出的疗效/风险信息的审查。该处方集的另一个组成部分是为所选的每种药物提供简明、公正的处方信息。一些产品选择准则已被证明在为发展中国家建立和维持基本药物处方方面是有效的。这些指导方针包括:1。选择已证实有效且风险可接受的药物;2. 选择治疗流行疾病所需的最低药物数量;3.只有在发现新产品比目前使用的产品有明显优势时才纳入;4. 只有当组合产品比单一成分提供真正的益处时才纳入;5. 为流行疾病选择具有明确“首选药物”适应症的药物;6. 评估产品的管理和成本影响;和7。选择具有既定高质量的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data. A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles. Testing in a Prespecified Subgroup and the Intent-to-Treat Population. The Correction of Product Information in Drug References and Medical Textbooks Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1