Statistical considerations in the design, analysis, and interpretation of comparative clinical studies.

G G Koch, W A Sollecito
{"title":"Statistical considerations in the design, analysis, and interpretation of comparative clinical studies.","authors":"G G Koch,&nbsp;W A Sollecito","doi":"10.1177/009286158401800204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative clinical studies are extensively used as a basis of support for the potential approval of treatments by the Food and Drug Administration and also for other general health policy decisions. The purpose of this paper is to review statistical principles that are relevant to the design, analysis, and interpretation of comparative clinical studies. Three general criteria are emphasized: clarity, comparability, and generalizability. These criteria are discussed in terms of their implications to such considerations as scope of patient population, sample size, randomization, and covariance analysis. Also, an extensive reference list further addressing these topics is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"18 2","pages":"131-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158401800204","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158401800204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Comparative clinical studies are extensively used as a basis of support for the potential approval of treatments by the Food and Drug Administration and also for other general health policy decisions. The purpose of this paper is to review statistical principles that are relevant to the design, analysis, and interpretation of comparative clinical studies. Three general criteria are emphasized: clarity, comparability, and generalizability. These criteria are discussed in terms of their implications to such considerations as scope of patient population, sample size, randomization, and covariance analysis. Also, an extensive reference list further addressing these topics is presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较临床研究的设计、分析和解释中的统计学考虑。
比较临床研究被广泛用作支持食品和药物管理局可能批准的治疗方法以及其他一般卫生政策决定的基础。本文的目的是回顾与比较临床研究的设计、分析和解释相关的统计原理。强调三个一般标准:清晰性、可比性和概括性。这些标准讨论了他们的影响,如考虑患者群体的范围,样本量,随机化和协方差分析。此外,还提供了进一步解决这些主题的广泛参考列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data. A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles. Testing in a Prespecified Subgroup and the Intent-to-Treat Population. The Correction of Product Information in Drug References and Medical Textbooks Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1