FDA's conduct, review, and evaluation of inspections of clinical investigators.

G Turner, A B Lisook, D P Delman
{"title":"FDA's conduct, review, and evaluation of inspections of clinical investigators.","authors":"G Turner,&nbsp;A B Lisook,&nbsp;D P Delman","doi":"10.1177/009286158702100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review of the Food and Drug Administration's Bioresearch Monitoring Program focuses on the inspection of clinical investigators who study investigational drugs. The differences between routine, \"for-cause,\" and bioequivalency/bioavailability inspections are examined, with emphasis on the responsibilities of the clinical investigator, reasons for conducting the inspections, and problems found. Important aspects of the inspection report, such as protocol adherence, records maintenance, informed consent, institutional review board approval, and drug accountability, are outlined. The disqualification and consent agreement processes for investigators with serious problems are explained. FDA policies on third-party notification and remote data entry are noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"21 2","pages":"117-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158702100202","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158702100202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This review of the Food and Drug Administration's Bioresearch Monitoring Program focuses on the inspection of clinical investigators who study investigational drugs. The differences between routine, "for-cause," and bioequivalency/bioavailability inspections are examined, with emphasis on the responsibilities of the clinical investigator, reasons for conducting the inspections, and problems found. Important aspects of the inspection report, such as protocol adherence, records maintenance, informed consent, institutional review board approval, and drug accountability, are outlined. The disqualification and consent agreement processes for investigators with serious problems are explained. FDA policies on third-party notification and remote data entry are noted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA的行为,审查和评估临床研究人员的检查。
本文回顾了美国食品和药物管理局的生物研究监测计划,重点是对研究研究药物的临床研究人员的检查。检查常规、“原因”和生物等效性/生物利用度检查之间的差异,重点是临床研究者的责任、进行检查的原因和发现的问题。检查报告的重要方面,如方案遵守、记录维护、知情同意、机构审查委员会批准和药品问责制,都进行了概述。解释了严重问题调查员的取消资格和同意协议程序。注意到FDA关于第三方通知和远程数据输入的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data. A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles. Testing in a Prespecified Subgroup and the Intent-to-Treat Population. The Correction of Product Information in Drug References and Medical Textbooks Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1