Demystifying the patient dropout: a study of 122 brief-stay day-treatment center admissions.

L Bauman, H J Nieporent, J Ferguson, J Klein, G Dunne, C Rudoltz
{"title":"Demystifying the patient dropout: a study of 122 brief-stay day-treatment center admissions.","authors":"L Bauman,&nbsp;H J Nieporent,&nbsp;J Ferguson,&nbsp;J Klein,&nbsp;G Dunne,&nbsp;C Rudoltz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Past studies examining the dropout from treatment phenomenon have failed to identify comparable populations or a standardized definition of the term \"patient dropout.\" Although the phenomenon is widespread, few investigators have studied the problem within day-treatment programs serving subacutely disturbed clients in need of socialization or prevocational services. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine the reasons for brief Day Treatment Center (DTC) stays of 10 sessions or fewer and to ascertain implications of these findings for admission screening processes. Analysis of demographic information revealed that the average brief-stay patient was in his mid-thirties, was single (65%), was schizophrenic (39%) or suffering a mood disorder (27%), and had attended up to 4 days (63%) before leaving treatment. A retrospective review of 122 brief stay records revealed six categories of reasons for leaving the DTC: (1) a desire to return to work, (2) exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms, (3) resistance to treatment recommendations, (4) negative reaction to the treatment milieu, (5) a desire for less intense treatment, and (6) a belief that problems were resolved during the brief stay. The authors concluded that admission screening interviewers would benefit from complete past school and work records. Strategies for reducing dropout rates should include (1) longer transition periods for newly referred patients, (2) obligatory meetings with the patient and his family and therapist before inpatient discharge, and (3) improved orientation to the DTC program.</p>","PeriodicalId":79650,"journal":{"name":"International journal of partial hospitalization","volume":"5 3","pages":"215-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of partial hospitalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past studies examining the dropout from treatment phenomenon have failed to identify comparable populations or a standardized definition of the term "patient dropout." Although the phenomenon is widespread, few investigators have studied the problem within day-treatment programs serving subacutely disturbed clients in need of socialization or prevocational services. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine the reasons for brief Day Treatment Center (DTC) stays of 10 sessions or fewer and to ascertain implications of these findings for admission screening processes. Analysis of demographic information revealed that the average brief-stay patient was in his mid-thirties, was single (65%), was schizophrenic (39%) or suffering a mood disorder (27%), and had attended up to 4 days (63%) before leaving treatment. A retrospective review of 122 brief stay records revealed six categories of reasons for leaving the DTC: (1) a desire to return to work, (2) exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms, (3) resistance to treatment recommendations, (4) negative reaction to the treatment milieu, (5) a desire for less intense treatment, and (6) a belief that problems were resolved during the brief stay. The authors concluded that admission screening interviewers would benefit from complete past school and work records. Strategies for reducing dropout rates should include (1) longer transition periods for newly referred patients, (2) obligatory meetings with the patient and his family and therapist before inpatient discharge, and (3) improved orientation to the DTC program.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开患者退出的神秘面纱:一项对122名短期住院日间治疗中心住院患者的研究。
过去对退出治疗现象的研究未能确定可比较的人群或对“患者退出”一词的标准化定义。虽然这一现象很普遍,但很少有研究者在为需要社会化或职业前服务的亚急性心理障碍患者提供日间治疗项目中研究这一问题。本研究的主要目的是确定在日间治疗中心(DTC)短暂停留10次或更少的原因,并确定这些发现对入院筛选过程的影响。对人口统计信息的分析显示,短期住院患者的平均年龄为35岁左右,单身(65%),患有精神分裂症(39%)或患有情绪障碍(27%),并且在离开治疗前接受了长达4天的治疗(63%)。对122份短期住院记录的回顾性研究揭示了离开DTC的六类原因:(1)希望重返工作岗位,(2)精神症状加剧,(3)对治疗建议的抵制,(4)对治疗环境的负面反应,(5)希望减轻治疗强度,(6)相信问题在短暂住院期间得到了解决。作者的结论是,招生面试官将受益于完整的过去的学校和工作记录。降低辍学率的策略应该包括:(1)延长新转诊患者的过渡期,(2)住院出院前与患者及其家人和治疗师的强制性会议,以及(3)改善对DTC计划的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A discharge survey of twenty day treatment program patients. Mobilizing affect: a possible effect of day hospital treatment for chronic psychiatric patients. The building blocks of a quality day treatment program: the business plan. Understanding partial hospitalization through a continuity-of-care model. Level of disrupted peer relations and poor self-esteem in children with behavior problems and the effectiveness of day treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1