Evaluating the literature.

S I Barr
{"title":"Evaluating the literature.","authors":"S I Barr","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to read critically and evaluate research literature will increase in importance as the dietetic profession builds a research base to support practice. In this article, the \"who, why, what, where, and when\" of critiquing the literature are presented. An overview of \"how\" to critique the literature is outlined in a 10-step process that emphasizes effective time use. At each step, a decision is made to continue reading the article or to go to the next article or journal. The process includes examination of: 1) the journal and the title of the article; 2) the authors' names; 3) the abstract; 4) the introduction; 5) the objective of the study; 6) the methods; 7) the results; 8) the discussion; and 9) the conclusions. The 10th step, reached only if the article satisfactorily addresses the previous nine, is to attempt to use the information in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":79677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association","volume":"50 4","pages":"219-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to read critically and evaluate research literature will increase in importance as the dietetic profession builds a research base to support practice. In this article, the "who, why, what, where, and when" of critiquing the literature are presented. An overview of "how" to critique the literature is outlined in a 10-step process that emphasizes effective time use. At each step, a decision is made to continue reading the article or to go to the next article or journal. The process includes examination of: 1) the journal and the title of the article; 2) the authors' names; 3) the abstract; 4) the introduction; 5) the objective of the study; 6) the methods; 7) the results; 8) the discussion; and 9) the conclusions. The 10th step, reached only if the article satisfactorily addresses the previous nine, is to attempt to use the information in practice.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价文献。
随着营养学专业建立一个支持实践的研究基础,批判性阅读和评价研究文献的能力将变得越来越重要。在这篇文章中,“谁,为什么,什么,在哪里,什么时候”的批评文献提出。在强调有效利用时间的10个步骤中概述了“如何”批评文献。在每一步中,决定是继续阅读这篇文章还是转到下一篇文章或期刊。该过程包括:1)期刊和文章标题的审查;(二)作者姓名;3)摘要;4)引言;5)研究目的;6)方法;7)结果;8)讨论;9)结论。只有文章圆满地解决了前九个步骤,才能达到第十步,即尝试在实践中使用这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working together for health: NSDA's (Nova Scotia Dietetic Association) submission to the Blueprint Committee on Health System Reform. Survey of food-related waste management practises in New Brunswick health establishments. The Canadian Dietetic Association Biotechnology Committee opinion paper on biotechnology and food. Clinical specialization programs for dietitians: a needs assessment. Measuring outcomes of nutrition intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1