{"title":"QA in a health maintenance organization IPA model.","authors":"P M Romano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The PRO is working collaboratively with the American Medical Peer Review Association (AMPRA), the Group Health Association of America (GHAA), the American Medical Care and Review Association (AMCRA) and the California Association of HMOs, Inc. to develop meaningful and acceptable methodology for future review. It has become clear that both the PRO and the HMO must modify systems in order to accomplish stated objectives in the unique IPA setting. Internally, the HMO must rethink management information systems in order to provide data in a timely fashion. The PRO, as well, must strive to understand how an IPA model differs from fee-for-service Medicare review and be prepared to modify exiting systems so defined by their contract with HCFA. Managed care in any model imposes the same responsibility for quality as other health care delivery systems. Only by cooperation and support of the quality process in concert with providers and review organizations can the IPA model measure whether the quality of its services meet professionally recognized standards of health care and whether appropriate health care services have been provided in appropriate settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality assurance : a publication of the National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals","volume":"10 5","pages":"26-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality assurance : a publication of the National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The PRO is working collaboratively with the American Medical Peer Review Association (AMPRA), the Group Health Association of America (GHAA), the American Medical Care and Review Association (AMCRA) and the California Association of HMOs, Inc. to develop meaningful and acceptable methodology for future review. It has become clear that both the PRO and the HMO must modify systems in order to accomplish stated objectives in the unique IPA setting. Internally, the HMO must rethink management information systems in order to provide data in a timely fashion. The PRO, as well, must strive to understand how an IPA model differs from fee-for-service Medicare review and be prepared to modify exiting systems so defined by their contract with HCFA. Managed care in any model imposes the same responsibility for quality as other health care delivery systems. Only by cooperation and support of the quality process in concert with providers and review organizations can the IPA model measure whether the quality of its services meet professionally recognized standards of health care and whether appropriate health care services have been provided in appropriate settings.
PRO正在与美国医学同行评议协会(AMPRA)、美国团体健康协会(GHAA)、美国医疗保健和评议协会(AMCRA)和加州卫生组织协会(California Association of hmo,公司)合作,为未来的评议制定有意义和可接受的方法。很明显,PRO和HMO都必须修改系统,以便在独特的IPA环境中实现既定目标。在内部,HMO必须重新考虑管理信息系统,以便及时提供数据。专业人员也必须努力了解IPA模式与按服务收费的医疗保险审查有何不同,并准备修改现有的系统,这些系统是由他们与HCFA的合同定义的。任何模式下的管理式医疗都与其他卫生保健提供系统一样,对质量负有同样的责任。只有通过与提供者和审查组织协调一致的质量进程的合作和支持,IPA模式才能衡量其服务质量是否符合专业公认的保健标准,以及是否在适当的环境中提供了适当的保健服务。