QA in a health maintenance organization IPA model.

P M Romano
{"title":"QA in a health maintenance organization IPA model.","authors":"P M Romano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The PRO is working collaboratively with the American Medical Peer Review Association (AMPRA), the Group Health Association of America (GHAA), the American Medical Care and Review Association (AMCRA) and the California Association of HMOs, Inc. to develop meaningful and acceptable methodology for future review. It has become clear that both the PRO and the HMO must modify systems in order to accomplish stated objectives in the unique IPA setting. Internally, the HMO must rethink management information systems in order to provide data in a timely fashion. The PRO, as well, must strive to understand how an IPA model differs from fee-for-service Medicare review and be prepared to modify exiting systems so defined by their contract with HCFA. Managed care in any model imposes the same responsibility for quality as other health care delivery systems. Only by cooperation and support of the quality process in concert with providers and review organizations can the IPA model measure whether the quality of its services meet professionally recognized standards of health care and whether appropriate health care services have been provided in appropriate settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":79675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality assurance : a publication of the National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals","volume":"10 5","pages":"26-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality assurance : a publication of the National Association of Quality Assurance Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The PRO is working collaboratively with the American Medical Peer Review Association (AMPRA), the Group Health Association of America (GHAA), the American Medical Care and Review Association (AMCRA) and the California Association of HMOs, Inc. to develop meaningful and acceptable methodology for future review. It has become clear that both the PRO and the HMO must modify systems in order to accomplish stated objectives in the unique IPA setting. Internally, the HMO must rethink management information systems in order to provide data in a timely fashion. The PRO, as well, must strive to understand how an IPA model differs from fee-for-service Medicare review and be prepared to modify exiting systems so defined by their contract with HCFA. Managed care in any model imposes the same responsibility for quality as other health care delivery systems. Only by cooperation and support of the quality process in concert with providers and review organizations can the IPA model measure whether the quality of its services meet professionally recognized standards of health care and whether appropriate health care services have been provided in appropriate settings.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康维护机构IPA模型中的质量保证。
PRO正在与美国医学同行评议协会(AMPRA)、美国团体健康协会(GHAA)、美国医疗保健和评议协会(AMCRA)和加州卫生组织协会(California Association of hmo,公司)合作,为未来的评议制定有意义和可接受的方法。很明显,PRO和HMO都必须修改系统,以便在独特的IPA环境中实现既定目标。在内部,HMO必须重新考虑管理信息系统,以便及时提供数据。专业人员也必须努力了解IPA模式与按服务收费的医疗保险审查有何不同,并准备修改现有的系统,这些系统是由他们与HCFA的合同定义的。任何模式下的管理式医疗都与其他卫生保健提供系统一样,对质量负有同样的责任。只有通过与提供者和审查组织协调一致的质量进程的合作和支持,IPA模式才能衡量其服务质量是否符合专业公认的保健标准,以及是否在适当的环境中提供了适当的保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benchmark matrix and guide: Part II. Benchmark matrix and guide: Part I. Headquarters Air Force Logistics Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH. An update on national efforts to manage private sector utilization review. Top 10 health care law firms--ranked by number of attorneys spending more than 75% of their time on health law. Integration of risk management and quality review. Part III: Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1