Nurses' attitudes towards cost-effectiveness and quality of care.

R Owens, S N Cronin
{"title":"Nurses' attitudes towards cost-effectiveness and quality of care.","authors":"R Owens,&nbsp;S N Cronin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe nurses' attitudes toward cost-effectiveness in nursing practice and its perceived effects on quality of care, and to examine the influence of role, education, and experience on these attitudes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comparative, descriptive design was used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two community hospitals in the midwest.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Registered nurses and licensed practical nurses.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Blaney Hobson Nursing Attitude Scale was used to measure nurses' attitudes toward cost-effectiveness. Demographic information was obtained by asking open-ended questions. Scores ranged from 30 to 96, with a mean score of 65.57 (SD = 13.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses with greater than 10 years experience had more positive attitudes than nurses with 10 years or less experience. Nurses in administration/management positions had more positive attitudes than did staff nurses. No significant correlation was found between education level and attitudes toward cost-effectiveness. The major concern of participants was that quality of care would suffer due to cost containment efforts. The majority of participants agreed that education in cost containment and budgetary issues should begin in basic nursing school and should be included in employer orientation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":79858,"journal":{"name":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","volume":"4 3","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost & quality quarterly journal : CQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe nurses' attitudes toward cost-effectiveness in nursing practice and its perceived effects on quality of care, and to examine the influence of role, education, and experience on these attitudes.

Design: A comparative, descriptive design was used.

Setting: Two community hospitals in the midwest.

Subjects: Registered nurses and licensed practical nurses.

Measurements and main results: Blaney Hobson Nursing Attitude Scale was used to measure nurses' attitudes toward cost-effectiveness. Demographic information was obtained by asking open-ended questions. Scores ranged from 30 to 96, with a mean score of 65.57 (SD = 13.58).

Conclusions: Nurses with greater than 10 years experience had more positive attitudes than nurses with 10 years or less experience. Nurses in administration/management positions had more positive attitudes than did staff nurses. No significant correlation was found between education level and attitudes toward cost-effectiveness. The major concern of participants was that quality of care would suffer due to cost containment efforts. The majority of participants agreed that education in cost containment and budgetary issues should begin in basic nursing school and should be included in employer orientation programs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对成本效益和护理质量的态度。
目的:描述护士在护理实践中对成本效益的态度及其对护理质量的感知影响,并研究角色、教育和经验对这些态度的影响。设计:采用对比性、描述性设计。环境:中西部的两家社区医院。科目:注册护士和执业护士。测量方法及主要结果:采用Blaney Hobson护理态度量表测量护士对成本-效果的态度。人口统计信息是通过询问开放式问题获得的。评分范围为30 ~ 96分,平均得分65.57分(SD = 13.58)。结论:经验≥10年的护士比经验≥10年的护士态度更积极。行政/管理职位的护士比普通护士的态度更积极。教育程度与成本效益态度之间无显著相关。与会者的主要关切是,由于成本控制的努力,护理质量将受到影响。大多数与会者同意,成本控制和预算问题的教育应该从基础护理学校开始,并应包括在雇主培训计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From paper charts to the spoken electronic medical record. Contact capitation for specialists. What to do if you're behind on your payroll taxes. Kansas ruling threatens peer review. Adams v. St. Francis Medical Center. Civil rights claims and physician peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1