Xenogeneic ossicular implants: an experimental study of heterotopic, demineralized, lyophilized, porcine implants in the guinea-pig.

Abstract

This study was done to compare the outcome of porcine ossicular implants in the middle ear and the subcutaneous dorsal region of the guinea-pig to those of allo-implants implanted in parallel in the dorsal region. The implants were heteropic, xenogeneic, demineralized (HCl), lyophilized and sterilized. The evaluation was histological (light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy) and immunological (immunofluorescence staining). Fifty-four guinea-pigs were implanted in the middle ear and 14 of them were also implanted subcutaneously in the dorsal region with xeno-implants and allo-implants. The middle ear implants were found to be constantly reossified and coated with normal mucosa with only a minimal immune reaction. In contrast, the dorsal xeno-implants were found to be the target of mononucleic infiltration, fibrous encapsulation and an influx of immunoglobulins resulting in segregation. The corresponding allo-implants were found to be partially reoccupied and reossified. These findings highlight the value of HCl demineralization in the induction of non-species-specific Bone Morphogenetic Protein and the failure of attempts at immuno-despecification. It appears that the fate of the implant depends less on its antigenic load than on the site of implantation. In this regard the middle ear is apparently very advantageous. The very good short-term tolerance and recovery observed in the middle ear xeno-implant suggest that these implants offer sufficiently good results to warrant clinical testing.