Care co-ordination improves quality-of-care at South Auckland Health

P Gow BMedSci, FAFRM, FACRM, S Berg BA, MPH, D Smith FRACP, FAFPHM, D Ross RGON, BHSc
{"title":"Care co-ordination improves quality-of-care at South Auckland Health","authors":"P Gow BMedSci, FAFRM, FACRM,&nbsp;S Berg BA, MPH,&nbsp;D Smith FRACP, FAFPHM,&nbsp;D Ross RGON, BHSc","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Inpatient discharge surveys at Middlemore hospital, a 600 bed hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand, consistently rate communication and co-ordination of care as parameters in need of improvement. A case management model of care was suggested as a means of achieving this. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of care co-ordination in an acute general medical setting in a pilot study over a 4 week period. A care co-ordinator identified 18 patients with complex problems among 48 patients admitted to a single medical ward under the care of a single multidisciplinary team, with their care being co-ordinated over the entire episode of illness. A control group of 59 similarly complex patients admitted to other wards and teams without care co-ordination over the same period was also studied and the outcomes compared. Communication and co-ordination, discharge information, involvement in discharge planning and information on post-discharge services were rated by the study patients as good or very good by 77, 85, 69 and 77%, respectively, compared with 62, 30, 41 and 45% in the control group. The same parameters were rated as poor or very poor by 13, 30, 36 and 15% of the control patients, compared with 0% in all these measures in the study group. Twenty-one clinical staff involved in the study agreed that there was an improvement in care co-ordination with respect to efficiency, reduction of workload and better communication, with approval ratings being 71, 76 and 76%, respectively. There was no difference in Average Length of Stay between the control and study groups, but three of the patients in the control group may have had their preventable readmissions within 10 days avoided if their care had been co-ordinated during their initial admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"19 2","pages":"107-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract Inpatient discharge surveys at Middlemore hospital, a 600 bed hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand, consistently rate communication and co-ordination of care as parameters in need of improvement. A case management model of care was suggested as a means of achieving this. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of care co-ordination in an acute general medical setting in a pilot study over a 4 week period. A care co-ordinator identified 18 patients with complex problems among 48 patients admitted to a single medical ward under the care of a single multidisciplinary team, with their care being co-ordinated over the entire episode of illness. A control group of 59 similarly complex patients admitted to other wards and teams without care co-ordination over the same period was also studied and the outcomes compared. Communication and co-ordination, discharge information, involvement in discharge planning and information on post-discharge services were rated by the study patients as good or very good by 77, 85, 69 and 77%, respectively, compared with 62, 30, 41 and 45% in the control group. The same parameters were rated as poor or very poor by 13, 30, 36 and 15% of the control patients, compared with 0% in all these measures in the study group. Twenty-one clinical staff involved in the study agreed that there was an improvement in care co-ordination with respect to efficiency, reduction of workload and better communication, with approval ratings being 71, 76 and 76%, respectively. There was no difference in Average Length of Stay between the control and study groups, but three of the patients in the control group may have had their preventable readmissions within 10 days avoided if their care had been co-ordinated during their initial admission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理协调提高了南奥克兰保健中心的护理质量
米德尔莫尔医院是新西兰南奥克兰一家拥有600张床位的医院,该医院的住院出院调查显示,沟通和护理协调一直是需要改进的参数。建议采用病例管理模式作为实现这一目标的一种手段。本研究的目的是在为期4周的初步研究中确定在急性一般医疗环境中护理协调的有效性。一名护理协调员在一个多学科小组护理的一个病房收治的48名病人中确定了18名有复杂问题的病人,他们的护理在整个疾病期间得到协调。研究人员还研究了59名同样复杂的对照组患者,他们在同一时期住在其他病房和没有护理协调的小组,并对结果进行了比较。研究患者对沟通协调、出院信息、参与出院计划和出院后服务信息的评价分别为77%、85%、69%和77%,而对照组的评价分别为62%、30%、41%和45%。同样的参数被13%、30%、36%和15%的对照患者评为差或极差,而在研究组中,所有这些指标均为0%。参与研究的21名临床工作人员一致认为,在效率、工作量减少和更好的沟通方面,护理协调有所改善,支持率分别为71%、76%和76%。对照组和研究组的平均住院时间没有差异,但对照组中有三名患者如果在初次入院时得到协调治疗,可能在10天内避免了可预防的再入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health technology assessment. Notices Letters to the Editor Notices Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1