P Gow BMedSci, FAFRM, FACRM, S Berg BA, MPH, D Smith FRACP, FAFPHM, D Ross RGON, BHSc
{"title":"Care co-ordination improves quality-of-care at South Auckland Health","authors":"P Gow BMedSci, FAFRM, FACRM, S Berg BA, MPH, D Smith FRACP, FAFPHM, D Ross RGON, BHSc","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> Inpatient discharge surveys at Middlemore hospital, a 600 bed hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand, consistently rate communication and co-ordination of care as parameters in need of improvement. A case management model of care was suggested as a means of achieving this. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of care co-ordination in an acute general medical setting in a pilot study over a 4 week period. A care co-ordinator identified 18 patients with complex problems among 48 patients admitted to a single medical ward under the care of a single multidisciplinary team, with their care being co-ordinated over the entire episode of illness. A control group of 59 similarly complex patients admitted to other wards and teams without care co-ordination over the same period was also studied and the outcomes compared. Communication and co-ordination, discharge information, involvement in discharge planning and information on post-discharge services were rated by the study patients as good or very good by 77, 85, 69 and 77%, respectively, compared with 62, 30, 41 and 45% in the control group. The same parameters were rated as poor or very poor by 13, 30, 36 and 15% of the control patients, compared with 0% in all these measures in the study group. Twenty-one clinical staff involved in the study agreed that there was an improvement in care co-ordination with respect to efficiency, reduction of workload and better communication, with approval ratings being 71, 76 and 76%, respectively. There was no difference in Average Length of Stay between the control and study groups, but three of the patients in the control group may have had their preventable readmissions within 10 days avoided if their care had been co-ordinated during their initial admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"19 2","pages":"107-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract Inpatient discharge surveys at Middlemore hospital, a 600 bed hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand, consistently rate communication and co-ordination of care as parameters in need of improvement. A case management model of care was suggested as a means of achieving this. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of care co-ordination in an acute general medical setting in a pilot study over a 4 week period. A care co-ordinator identified 18 patients with complex problems among 48 patients admitted to a single medical ward under the care of a single multidisciplinary team, with their care being co-ordinated over the entire episode of illness. A control group of 59 similarly complex patients admitted to other wards and teams without care co-ordination over the same period was also studied and the outcomes compared. Communication and co-ordination, discharge information, involvement in discharge planning and information on post-discharge services were rated by the study patients as good or very good by 77, 85, 69 and 77%, respectively, compared with 62, 30, 41 and 45% in the control group. The same parameters were rated as poor or very poor by 13, 30, 36 and 15% of the control patients, compared with 0% in all these measures in the study group. Twenty-one clinical staff involved in the study agreed that there was an improvement in care co-ordination with respect to efficiency, reduction of workload and better communication, with approval ratings being 71, 76 and 76%, respectively. There was no difference in Average Length of Stay between the control and study groups, but three of the patients in the control group may have had their preventable readmissions within 10 days avoided if their care had been co-ordinated during their initial admission.