Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm using the EVT device: limited increased utilization with availability of a bifurcated graft.

R Sarkar, W S Moore, W J Quiñones-Baldrich, A S Gomes
{"title":"Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm using the EVT device: limited increased utilization with availability of a bifurcated graft.","authors":"R Sarkar,&nbsp;W S Moore,&nbsp;W J Quiñones-Baldrich,&nbsp;A S Gomes","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0131:EROAAA>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if the availability of a bifurcated graft would increase the percentage of patients eligible for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients were evaluated prospectively for endovascular AAA repair at a university referral center. Data were collected on eligibility for tube or bifurcated endovascular grafts, reasons for exclusion, aneurysm morphology, and the interventions performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six (25%) patients were eligible for endovascular treatment using the first-generation Endovascular Technologies (EVT) system: 19 (10%) for a tube graft and 27 (15%) for a bifurcated device. An unsuitable proximal neck was the reason for exclusion in 48% of patients (excess diameter in 27%, inadequate length in 21%). Unsuitable iliac configuration was present in 41% of those excluded; 29% of the common iliac arteries were enlarged or aneurysmal, while 12% were small or tortuous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a bifurcated graft more than doubles the eligibility of AAA patients for endovascular repair, the configuration of the proximal neck and iliac disease excluded the majority of AAA patients from endovascular therapy using the first generation EVT device.</p>","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0131:EROAAA>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if the availability of a bifurcated graft would increase the percentage of patients eligible for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods: One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients were evaluated prospectively for endovascular AAA repair at a university referral center. Data were collected on eligibility for tube or bifurcated endovascular grafts, reasons for exclusion, aneurysm morphology, and the interventions performed.

Results: Forty-six (25%) patients were eligible for endovascular treatment using the first-generation Endovascular Technologies (EVT) system: 19 (10%) for a tube graft and 27 (15%) for a bifurcated device. An unsuitable proximal neck was the reason for exclusion in 48% of patients (excess diameter in 27%, inadequate length in 21%). Unsuitable iliac configuration was present in 41% of those excluded; 29% of the common iliac arteries were enlarged or aneurysmal, while 12% were small or tortuous.

Conclusions: Although a bifurcated graft more than doubles the eligibility of AAA patients for endovascular repair, the configuration of the proximal neck and iliac disease excluded the majority of AAA patients from endovascular therapy using the first generation EVT device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用EVT装置进行腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复:随着分叉移植的可用性,应用的增加有限。
目的:确定分叉移植是否会增加腹主动脉瘤血管内修复(AAAs)患者的比例。方法:在一所大学转诊中心对185例连续患者进行血管内AAA修复的前瞻性评估。收集了导管或分岔血管内移植物的资格、排除原因、动脉瘤形态和实施的干预措施的数据。结果:46例(25%)患者符合使用第一代血管内技术(EVT)系统进行血管内治疗的条件:19例(10%)患者接受管移植物治疗,27例(15%)患者接受分叉装置治疗。48%的患者因近端颈部不合适而被排除在外(27%的患者直径过大,21%的患者长度不足)。41%的被排除者存在不合适的髂结构;29%的髂总动脉扩张或动脉瘤状,12%的髂总动脉狭窄或迂曲。结论:尽管分叉移植物使AAA患者接受血管内修复的资格增加了一倍以上,但颈部和髂近端疾病的结构使大多数AAA患者无法使用第一代EVT装置进行血管内治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aorto-left renal vein fistula: is there a place for endovascular management? Aortocaval fistula: a challenge for endovascular management. Endovascular repair of an aortoenteric fistula in a high-risk patient. Carotid stenting using radial artery access. Neurological monitoring during carotid artery stenting: the Duck Squeezing Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1