Evaluation of hematopoietic progenitors in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplants. CD34+ dose effect in marrow recovery. Retrospective analysis in 38 patients.

R Gabús, A Magariños, M Zamora, E De Lisa, A I Landoni, G Martínez, C Canessa, H Giordano, E Bodega
{"title":"Evaluation of hematopoietic progenitors in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplants. CD34+ dose effect in marrow recovery. Retrospective analysis in 38 patients.","authors":"R Gabús,&nbsp;A Magariños,&nbsp;M Zamora,&nbsp;E De Lisa,&nbsp;A I Landoni,&nbsp;G Martínez,&nbsp;C Canessa,&nbsp;H Giordano,&nbsp;E Bodega","doi":"10.1007/s00282-999-0171-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our main goal was to evaluate the CD34+ dose in patients undergoing haemotopoietic stem celltransplantation and its results in terms of recovery of neutrophile and platelet counts, transfusion requirements, days of fever, antibiotic requirements and length of hospital stay. We studied 38 consecutive patients with haematological malignancies transplanted at our Department, from Feb. 96 through Sept. 98. The CD34+ cell quantification technique was standardized, using a modification of the ISAGHE 96 protocol. Patients were sorted into three groups according to the CD34+ count administered: a) between 3 and 5 x 10(6) cells/kg; b) between 5 and 10 x 10(6) cells/kg; c) > 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. As a secondary end point, results were assessed according to the number of aphereses required to arrive at the target count of CD34+, separating those patients that required only 1 or 2 aphereses versus those requiring 3 or more. Finally, an analysis was made of the results of transplantation comparing the different sources of stem cells (PBSC versus PBSC + B.M.). The best results were obtained in the group with cells between 3 and 5 x 10(6) CD34+. No statistically significant advantages were found in the group with cells over 5. The supra-optimal dose of more 10 x 10(6) would yield no additional beneficial results, while they can imply a greater infusion of residual tumor cells. The number of aphereses had no impact on engraftment. Results obtained with PBSC transplants were better than those with BM+PBSC in terms of neutrophile and platelet recovery. The number of CD34+ cells remains the main element in stem cell transplantation to evaluate the haematopoietic recovery after engraftment. Minimum and optimum yields remain unclear. Centers should establish their own optimal dose based on local methodologies and outcomes, maximizing costs and benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":73231,"journal":{"name":"Hematology and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00282-999-0171-y","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00282-999-0171-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Our main goal was to evaluate the CD34+ dose in patients undergoing haemotopoietic stem celltransplantation and its results in terms of recovery of neutrophile and platelet counts, transfusion requirements, days of fever, antibiotic requirements and length of hospital stay. We studied 38 consecutive patients with haematological malignancies transplanted at our Department, from Feb. 96 through Sept. 98. The CD34+ cell quantification technique was standardized, using a modification of the ISAGHE 96 protocol. Patients were sorted into three groups according to the CD34+ count administered: a) between 3 and 5 x 10(6) cells/kg; b) between 5 and 10 x 10(6) cells/kg; c) > 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. As a secondary end point, results were assessed according to the number of aphereses required to arrive at the target count of CD34+, separating those patients that required only 1 or 2 aphereses versus those requiring 3 or more. Finally, an analysis was made of the results of transplantation comparing the different sources of stem cells (PBSC versus PBSC + B.M.). The best results were obtained in the group with cells between 3 and 5 x 10(6) CD34+. No statistically significant advantages were found in the group with cells over 5. The supra-optimal dose of more 10 x 10(6) would yield no additional beneficial results, while they can imply a greater infusion of residual tumor cells. The number of aphereses had no impact on engraftment. Results obtained with PBSC transplants were better than those with BM+PBSC in terms of neutrophile and platelet recovery. The number of CD34+ cells remains the main element in stem cell transplantation to evaluate the haematopoietic recovery after engraftment. Minimum and optimum yields remain unclear. Centers should establish their own optimal dose based on local methodologies and outcomes, maximizing costs and benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
造血祖细胞移植中造血祖细胞的评价。CD34+在骨髓恢复中的剂量效应。38例患者的回顾性分析。
我们的主要目标是评估接受造血干细胞移植的患者的CD34+剂量及其在中性粒细胞和血小板计数恢复、输血需求、发烧天数、抗生素需求和住院时间方面的结果。我们研究了从1996年2月到1998年9月在我科连续移植的38例恶性血液病患者。CD34+细胞定量技术标准化,使用ISAGHE 96方案的修改。根据给予的CD34+计数将患者分为三组:a) 3至5 x 10(6)个细胞/kg;B) 5至10 × 10(6)个细胞/kg;c) > 10 × 10(6)个CD34+细胞/kg。作为次要终点,根据达到CD34+目标计数所需的球团数来评估结果,将只需要1或2个球团的患者与需要3个或更多球团的患者分开。最后,对移植结果进行了分析,比较了不同来源的干细胞(PBSC与PBSC + bm)。细胞数在3 ~ 5 × 10(6) CD34+组效果最好。细胞数大于5的组无统计学上的显著优势。超过10 × 10(6)的超优剂量不会产生额外的有益结果,而它们可能意味着更多的残余肿瘤细胞输注。无球茎的数量对着床没有影响。在中性粒细胞和血小板恢复方面,移植PBSC优于BM+PBSC。CD34+细胞的数量仍然是干细胞移植评估移植后造血功能恢复的主要因素。最低和最佳产量仍不清楚。各中心应根据当地的方法和结果确定自己的最佳剂量,使成本和效益最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allogeneic bone marrow tranplantation for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: HLA-Matched sibling donor availability does not improve treatment ouctome Imbalance between the number of patients supplying stem cells for autologous transplantation and the number of patients receiving such transplants in France in 1997 and 1998 Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) a report of the BGMT cooperative group about 32 patients VECP-Bleo regimen as treatment of advanced stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in elderly patients a GOELAMS protocol Cost analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1