Day surgery in Scotland: patient satisfaction and outcomes.

J Bain, H Kelly, D Snadden, H Staines
{"title":"Day surgery in Scotland: patient satisfaction and outcomes.","authors":"J Bain,&nbsp;H Kelly,&nbsp;D Snadden,&nbsp;H Staines","doi":"10.1136/qshc.8.2.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patients' views on the process and outcome of day surgery in Scotland, and to study patients' satisfaction with care in a range of specific procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Questionnaires completed by a census of day case surgery patients within a band of 25 procedures under the umbrella of five broad groups: (1) general surgery; (2) urology; (3) gynaecology; (4) orthopaedics; (5) ear, nose, and throat; ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>13 hospitals in six health board areas in Scotland.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>During the period 1995-6, 5069 day case patients were asked to complete a questionnaire within two weeks of their operation and discharge from hospital.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Arrangements before admission; immediate postoperative symptoms and complications; problems experienced after discharge; readmission after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A response rate of 68% was obtained from 13 sites ranging from 43% to 82%. The overall satisfaction score was 85. A total of 894 patients (26%) experienced pain after surgery and 783 (23%) had relatively minor medical problems after discharge. In total, 265 (7.8%) patients were readmitted to hospital after discharge. Few notable differences existed between specialties or hospitals in terms of satisfaction scores, although notable pain was experienced more frequently in gynaecology and general surgery patients. Readmission was more common for urological procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, patient satisfaction with day case surgery was high. Dissatisfaction was largely related to waiting times between admission, operation, and discharge. The amount of pain experienced also had a notable impact on the level of patient satisfaction. Day surgery is not without complications, with 26% of patients experiencing notable degrees of pain; 23% having minor medical problems after discharge; and 8% of respondents having to reattend hospital with problems relating to their original operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"8 2","pages":"86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.2.86","citationCount":"105","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.2.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patients' views on the process and outcome of day surgery in Scotland, and to study patients' satisfaction with care in a range of specific procedures.

Design: Questionnaires completed by a census of day case surgery patients within a band of 25 procedures under the umbrella of five broad groups: (1) general surgery; (2) urology; (3) gynaecology; (4) orthopaedics; (5) ear, nose, and throat; ophthalmology.

Setting: 13 hospitals in six health board areas in Scotland.

Subjects: During the period 1995-6, 5069 day case patients were asked to complete a questionnaire within two weeks of their operation and discharge from hospital.

Main outcome measures: Arrangements before admission; immediate postoperative symptoms and complications; problems experienced after discharge; readmission after discharge.

Results: A response rate of 68% was obtained from 13 sites ranging from 43% to 82%. The overall satisfaction score was 85. A total of 894 patients (26%) experienced pain after surgery and 783 (23%) had relatively minor medical problems after discharge. In total, 265 (7.8%) patients were readmitted to hospital after discharge. Few notable differences existed between specialties or hospitals in terms of satisfaction scores, although notable pain was experienced more frequently in gynaecology and general surgery patients. Readmission was more common for urological procedures.

Conclusion: Overall, patient satisfaction with day case surgery was high. Dissatisfaction was largely related to waiting times between admission, operation, and discharge. The amount of pain experienced also had a notable impact on the level of patient satisfaction. Day surgery is not without complications, with 26% of patients experiencing notable degrees of pain; 23% having minor medical problems after discharge; and 8% of respondents having to reattend hospital with problems relating to their original operations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰日间手术:患者满意度和结果。
目的:评估患者对苏格兰日间手术过程和结果的看法,并研究患者对一系列具体手术的护理满意度。设计:问卷调查是通过对五大类25种手术的日间手术患者进行普查来完成的:(1)普通外科;(2)泌尿外科;(3)妇科;(4)骨科;(5)耳、鼻、喉;眼科。环境:苏格兰6个卫生局辖区的13家医院。对象:在1995- 1996年期间,5069例日间病例患者被要求在手术和出院后两周内完成一份问卷。主要观察指标:入院前安排;术后即刻症状和并发症;出院后遇到的问题;出院后再入院。结果:在43% ~ 82%的13个站点中,有效率为68%。总体满意度为85分。共有894名患者(26%)在手术后出现疼痛,783名患者(23%)在出院后出现相对较小的医疗问题。共有265例(7.8%)患者出院后再次住院。不同专科或医院在满意度评分方面几乎没有显著差异,尽管妇科和普外科患者更频繁地经历明显的疼痛。泌尿外科手术再入院更为常见。结论:总体而言,患者对日间手术的满意度较高。不满意主要与入院、手术和出院之间的等待时间有关。疼痛程度对患者满意度也有显著影响。日间手术并非没有并发症,26%的患者经历了明显程度的疼痛;23%的人在出院后有轻微的医疗问题;8%的受访者因与原来的手术有关的问题不得不再次住院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1