Serological assays as alternatives to the Ph Eur challenge test for batch release of tetanus vaccines for human use.

R Winsnes, C Hendriksen, D Sesardic, A Akkermans, A Daas
{"title":"Serological assays as alternatives to the Ph Eur challenge test for batch release of tetanus vaccines for human use.","authors":"R Winsnes,&nbsp;C Hendriksen,&nbsp;D Sesardic,&nbsp;A Akkermans,&nbsp;A Daas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) monograph on Tetanus Vaccine (adsorbed) (1997: 0452), assessment of potency is based on a challenge test in guinea pigs or mice. The end-point is taken as paralysis or death. The test requires a large number of animals and causes severe distress. The aim of the present study was to refine the test, and reduce the number of animals needed, for batch release purposes. Serological assays having the potential of being internationally accepted, have been compared with Ph Eur assays. The study included five tetanus vaccines of various combinations and produced by different manufacturers. The results indicated an excellent correlation between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the challenge test (about 93% predictive value), as well as between the toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) test and the challenge test (about 95% predictive value) and between ELISA and the ToBI test (r = 0.92). Antitoxin concentrations determined by ELISA and ToBI were generally in the same range. An overall good correlation was also seen for serum pools of the guinea pigs injected with equal vaccine doses, between toxin neutralisation test in mice (TNT) and ELISA (r = 0.93) as well as between TNT and ToBI (r = 0.97). The ultimate goal of this project was to determine whether serological assays can be used for testing combined vaccines, particularly for tetanus and diphtheria components, using sera from the same animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11308,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biological standardization","volume":"101 ","pages":"277-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) monograph on Tetanus Vaccine (adsorbed) (1997: 0452), assessment of potency is based on a challenge test in guinea pigs or mice. The end-point is taken as paralysis or death. The test requires a large number of animals and causes severe distress. The aim of the present study was to refine the test, and reduce the number of animals needed, for batch release purposes. Serological assays having the potential of being internationally accepted, have been compared with Ph Eur assays. The study included five tetanus vaccines of various combinations and produced by different manufacturers. The results indicated an excellent correlation between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the challenge test (about 93% predictive value), as well as between the toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) test and the challenge test (about 95% predictive value) and between ELISA and the ToBI test (r = 0.92). Antitoxin concentrations determined by ELISA and ToBI were generally in the same range. An overall good correlation was also seen for serum pools of the guinea pigs injected with equal vaccine doses, between toxin neutralisation test in mice (TNT) and ELISA (r = 0.93) as well as between TNT and ToBI (r = 0.97). The ultimate goal of this project was to determine whether serological assays can be used for testing combined vaccines, particularly for tetanus and diphtheria components, using sera from the same animals.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清学分析可替代Ph Eur攻击试验,用于批量释放供人使用的破伤风疫苗。
根据欧洲药典(Ph Eur)关于破伤风疫苗的专论(1997:0452),效力的评估是基于对豚鼠或小鼠的攻毒试验。终点被认为是瘫痪或死亡。这项测试需要大量的动物,并造成严重的痛苦。本研究的目的是改进试验,减少所需动物的数量,以实现批量释放的目的。血清学测定具有被国际接受的潜力,已与Ph值测定法进行了比较。这项研究包括由不同制造商生产的五种不同组合的破伤风疫苗。结果表明,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)与攻毒试验(预测值约为93%)、毒素结合抑制试验(ToBI)与攻毒试验(预测值约为95%)、酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)与ToBI试验(r = 0.92)具有良好的相关性。ELISA测定的抗毒素浓度与ToBI测定的抗毒素浓度基本在同一范围内。注射等量疫苗的豚鼠血清池、小鼠毒素中和试验(TNT)和ELISA (r = 0.93)以及TNT和ToBI (r = 0.97)之间的总体相关性也很好。该项目的最终目标是确定血清学分析是否可用于使用来自同一动物的血清测试联合疫苗,特别是破伤风和白喉成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virus removal by filtration. Gamma irradiation of bovine sera. Efficient inactivation of viruses and mycoplasma in animal sera using UVC irradiation. A universal virus inactivant for decontaminating blood and biopharmaceutical products. Serum and serum substitutes: virus safety by inactivation or removal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1