Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography.

A R Jayaweera, K Wei, M Coggins, J P Bin, C Goodman, S Kaul
{"title":"Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography.","authors":"A R Jayaweera,&nbsp;K Wei,&nbsp;M Coggins,&nbsp;J P Bin,&nbsp;C Goodman,&nbsp;S Kaul","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.H2363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To define the role of capillaries in the control of coronary blood flow (CBF) reserve, we developed a model of the coronary circulation and evaluated experimental data in its context. Our model comprised three compartments connected in series (arterial, capillary, and venous), each with its own resistance. The resistance in each vascular compartment was derived from the model based on hemodynamic data obtained in nine dogs during baseline and stenosis, both at rest and during hyperemia. The capillary hydrostatic pressure was assumed to be constant in all stages. Although in the absence of stenosis, the contribution of capillaries to total myocardial vascular resistance was only 25 +/- 5% at rest, it increased to 75 +/- 14% during hyperemia, despite the total myocardial vascular resistance decreasing by 51 +/- 13%. In the presence of a noncritical stenosis, total myocardial vascular resistance decreased by 22 +/- 10% at rest, with no change in capillary resistance. During hyperemia, total myocardial vascular resistance increased by 58 +/- 50% in the presence of the noncritical stenosis. In this situation, because arteriolar and venular resistances were already minimal, the increase in myocardial vascular resistance was due to increased capillary resistance, making it the predominant source (84 +/- 8%) of total myocardial vascular resistance. Myocardial video intensity (VI) on myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which reflects capillary blood volume, decreased distal to the stenosis during hyperemia. In the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis at rest, myocardial VI also decreased, indicating that decrease in CBF was associated with an increase in capillary resistance. Our findings also provide an alternative explanation for the critical coronary closing pressure. Thus, contrary to previously held notions, capillaries play a vital role in the regulation of CBF.</p>","PeriodicalId":7590,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physiology","volume":"277 6","pages":"H2363-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.H2363","citationCount":"184","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.6.H2363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 184

Abstract

To define the role of capillaries in the control of coronary blood flow (CBF) reserve, we developed a model of the coronary circulation and evaluated experimental data in its context. Our model comprised three compartments connected in series (arterial, capillary, and venous), each with its own resistance. The resistance in each vascular compartment was derived from the model based on hemodynamic data obtained in nine dogs during baseline and stenosis, both at rest and during hyperemia. The capillary hydrostatic pressure was assumed to be constant in all stages. Although in the absence of stenosis, the contribution of capillaries to total myocardial vascular resistance was only 25 +/- 5% at rest, it increased to 75 +/- 14% during hyperemia, despite the total myocardial vascular resistance decreasing by 51 +/- 13%. In the presence of a noncritical stenosis, total myocardial vascular resistance decreased by 22 +/- 10% at rest, with no change in capillary resistance. During hyperemia, total myocardial vascular resistance increased by 58 +/- 50% in the presence of the noncritical stenosis. In this situation, because arteriolar and venular resistances were already minimal, the increase in myocardial vascular resistance was due to increased capillary resistance, making it the predominant source (84 +/- 8%) of total myocardial vascular resistance. Myocardial video intensity (VI) on myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which reflects capillary blood volume, decreased distal to the stenosis during hyperemia. In the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis at rest, myocardial VI also decreased, indicating that decrease in CBF was associated with an increase in capillary resistance. Our findings also provide an alternative explanation for the critical coronary closing pressure. Thus, contrary to previously held notions, capillaries play a vital role in the regulation of CBF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毛细血管在确定CBF储备中的作用:使用心肌超声造影的新见解。
为了确定毛细血管在控制冠状动脉血流(CBF)储备中的作用,我们建立了冠状动脉循环模型并在其背景下评估实验数据。我们的模型包括三个室室串联(动脉、毛细血管和静脉),每个室室都有自己的阻力。每个血管室的阻力是根据9只狗在基线和狭窄期间(休息和充血期间)获得的血流动力学数据得出的模型。假设毛细管静水压力在所有阶段都是恒定的。虽然在无狭窄的情况下,静息时毛细血管对心肌总血管阻力的贡献仅为25 +/- 5%,但充血时毛细血管对心肌总血管阻力的贡献增加到75 +/- 14%,尽管心肌总血管阻力下降了51 +/- 13%。在存在非临界狭窄的情况下,静息时心肌血管总阻力下降了22% +/- 10%,毛细血管阻力没有变化。充血期间,在存在非临界狭窄的情况下,总心肌血管阻力增加了58 +/- 50%。在这种情况下,由于动脉和静脉阻力已经很小,心肌血管阻力的增加是由于毛细血管阻力的增加,使其成为心肌血管总阻力的主要来源(84 +/- 8%)。充血时,心肌超声造影术(MCE)上反映毛细血管血容量的心肌视频强度(VI)在狭窄远端降低。在静息时存在限流狭窄时,心肌VI也下降,表明CBF的减少与毛细血管阻力的增加有关。我们的发现也为临界冠状动脉闭合压提供了另一种解释。因此,与以前持有的观念相反,毛细血管在CBF的调节中起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Intraoperative Fascial Traction in Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery; An Early Experience. Microvessel occlusions alter amyloid-beta plaque morphology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. De virtuele diabeteskliniek in een stroomversnelling? An interventional image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval method for in-vivo drug response assessment. Methods for Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia Reconstruction. A Review of the Outcomes for Ten Years of Surgical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1