Managed care organizations' arrangements with nurse practitioners: a Connecticut perspective.

J P O'Donnell, S S Cohen, D J Mason, K Baxter, A B Chase
{"title":"Managed care organizations' arrangements with nurse practitioners: a Connecticut perspective.","authors":"J P O'Donnell,&nbsp;S S Cohen,&nbsp;D J Mason,&nbsp;K Baxter,&nbsp;A B Chase","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executives in more than 50% of managed care organizations (MCOs) in New York and Connecticut were interviewed for information on the roles, participation, and listing of NPs as primary care providers. MCO executives are highly satisfied with their primary care provider NPs, particularly in women's health and geriatrics, secondary to spending more time teaching and explaining procedures than physicians. Among both health care professionals and the general public there is an overall lack of current knowledge and/or confusion about NPs and their practice. Eighty-two percent of executives in MCOs thought their organization should encourage the use of NPs as primary care providers. Beginning in the early 1960s, advanced practice nursing has shown steady growth. Research has found that NPs provide cost-effective, quality-driven patient care (Brown & Grimes, 1995; Cohen & Juszczak, 1997; Frampton & Wall, 1994; Hardy & Evans, 1995). Many thought health care reform would lead to an expansion of advanced practice nurses (APNs) and other nonphysician providers as primary care providers (Aiken & Salmon, 1994). Funding for and enrollment in graduate nursing programs rose nationwide (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 1996). Anecdotal reports indicated that NPs were not included in MCO primary care provider panels. The purpose of this study was to explore MCO arrangements with nurse practitioners and the factors that influence them.</p>","PeriodicalId":77840,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut nursing news (Meriden, Conn. : 1980)","volume":"71 1","pages":"19-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut nursing news (Meriden, Conn. : 1980)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executives in more than 50% of managed care organizations (MCOs) in New York and Connecticut were interviewed for information on the roles, participation, and listing of NPs as primary care providers. MCO executives are highly satisfied with their primary care provider NPs, particularly in women's health and geriatrics, secondary to spending more time teaching and explaining procedures than physicians. Among both health care professionals and the general public there is an overall lack of current knowledge and/or confusion about NPs and their practice. Eighty-two percent of executives in MCOs thought their organization should encourage the use of NPs as primary care providers. Beginning in the early 1960s, advanced practice nursing has shown steady growth. Research has found that NPs provide cost-effective, quality-driven patient care (Brown & Grimes, 1995; Cohen & Juszczak, 1997; Frampton & Wall, 1994; Hardy & Evans, 1995). Many thought health care reform would lead to an expansion of advanced practice nurses (APNs) and other nonphysician providers as primary care providers (Aiken & Salmon, 1994). Funding for and enrollment in graduate nursing programs rose nationwide (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 1996). Anecdotal reports indicated that NPs were not included in MCO primary care provider panels. The purpose of this study was to explore MCO arrangements with nurse practitioners and the factors that influence them.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理护理组织与执业护士的安排:康涅狄格州的观点。
在纽约和康涅狄格,超过50%的管理式医疗机构(MCOs)的高管接受了采访,以了解NPs作为初级保健提供者的角色、参与和列表信息。MCO管理人员对初级保健提供者np非常满意,特别是在妇女健康和老年病学方面,其次是比医生花更多的时间来教授和解释程序。在卫生保健专业人员和一般公众中,目前总体上缺乏对np及其实践的了解和/或困惑。82%的mco高管认为他们的组织应该鼓励使用np作为初级保健提供者。从20世纪60年代初开始,高级实践护理已经显示出稳定的增长。研究发现,np提供成本效益高、质量驱动的患者护理(Brown & Grimes, 1995;Cohen & Juszczak, 1997;Frampton & Wall, 1994;Hardy & Evans, 1995)。许多人认为医疗改革将导致高级执业护士(apn)和其他非医生提供者作为初级保健提供者的扩张(Aiken & Salmon, 1994)。在全国范围内,护理研究生项目的资金和入学人数都有所增加(美国护理学院协会,1996年)。轶事报告表明,NPs未被纳入MCO初级保健提供者小组。本研究的目的是探讨护理人员的MCO安排及其影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The martyrdom and myth of Edith Cavell. CHESS: the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System. A computer based program for patients and families. Yale School of Nursing researchers help people with AIDS benefit from drug therapies by meeting them where they live. Nursing school enrollments lag behind rising demand for RNS, AACN survey shows. Martha Minerva Franklin (1870-1968) pioneer from Connecticut.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1