Cell substrates: lessons learned and challenges remaining.

J C Petricciani
{"title":"Cell substrates: lessons learned and challenges remaining.","authors":"J C Petricciani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of cell substrates for the manufacture of biological products is directly related to a series of technical advances and challenges to the status quo, some of which were accepted quickly while others took more than a decade to resolve. The development of cell culture techniques in the 1950s opened the door to the manufacture of a wide range of biological products. The first major challenge occurred in the late 1960s when human diploid cells (HDCs) were developed and proposed as an alternative to primary cell cultures for the production of live viral vaccines such as polio, which up to that point had been produced in primary cells of various species. In the 1970s, attention was focussed on the use of continuous cell lines (CCLs) for the production of non-replicating biological products such as interferon (IFN). The next significant technical advance and challenge was the development of recombinant DNA and monoclonal antibody technologies in the 1980s, both of which required the use of CCLs. Although most of the issues relating to CCLs in the manufacture of biological products have been resolved, issues related to their use as substrates for live viral vaccines remain to be fully addressed. Those experiences in the past teach us clearly that a system in which regulatory authorities, industry, and the general biomedical community cooperate in finding solutions to problems and in reaching consensus on issues raised by technical advances is ultimately in everyone's best interest. The World Health Organization has played a major role in that regard, and it should continue to provide leadership in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":11308,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biological standardization","volume":"100 ","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of cell substrates for the manufacture of biological products is directly related to a series of technical advances and challenges to the status quo, some of which were accepted quickly while others took more than a decade to resolve. The development of cell culture techniques in the 1950s opened the door to the manufacture of a wide range of biological products. The first major challenge occurred in the late 1960s when human diploid cells (HDCs) were developed and proposed as an alternative to primary cell cultures for the production of live viral vaccines such as polio, which up to that point had been produced in primary cells of various species. In the 1970s, attention was focussed on the use of continuous cell lines (CCLs) for the production of non-replicating biological products such as interferon (IFN). The next significant technical advance and challenge was the development of recombinant DNA and monoclonal antibody technologies in the 1980s, both of which required the use of CCLs. Although most of the issues relating to CCLs in the manufacture of biological products have been resolved, issues related to their use as substrates for live viral vaccines remain to be fully addressed. Those experiences in the past teach us clearly that a system in which regulatory authorities, industry, and the general biomedical community cooperate in finding solutions to problems and in reaching consensus on issues raised by technical advances is ultimately in everyone's best interest. The World Health Organization has played a major role in that regard, and it should continue to provide leadership in this area.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞基质:经验教训和挑战。
细胞底物用于制造生物制品的历史与一系列技术进步和对现状的挑战直接相关,其中一些技术进步和挑战很快被接受,而另一些则需要十多年的时间才能解决。20世纪50年代细胞培养技术的发展为制造各种生物制品打开了大门。第一个重大挑战发生在20世纪60年代末,当时研制出了人类二倍体细胞(HDCs),并提出将其作为原代细胞培养物的替代品,用于生产脊髓灰质炎等活病毒疫苗,在此之前,脊髓灰质炎疫苗是在各种物种的原代细胞中生产的。在20世纪70年代,人们的注意力集中在使用连续细胞系(ccl)生产非复制生物产品,如干扰素(IFN)。下一个重大的技术进步和挑战是20世纪80年代重组DNA和单克隆抗体技术的发展,这两项技术都需要使用ccl。虽然与生产生物制品中的ccl有关的大多数问题已得到解决,但与使用ccl作为病毒活疫苗底物有关的问题仍有待充分解决。过去的经验清楚地告诉我们,一个由监管当局、工业界和一般生物医学界合作寻找问题的解决办法并就技术进步引起的问题达成共识的系统最终符合每个人的最佳利益。世界卫生组织在这方面发挥了重要作用,它应继续在这方面发挥领导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virus removal by filtration. Gamma irradiation of bovine sera. Efficient inactivation of viruses and mycoplasma in animal sera using UVC irradiation. A universal virus inactivant for decontaminating blood and biopharmaceutical products. Serum and serum substitutes: virus safety by inactivation or removal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1