International comparative analysis of injury mortality. Findings from the ICE on injury statistics. International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics.

Advance data Pub Date : 1998-10-07
L A Fingerhut, C S Cox, M Warner
{"title":"International comparative analysis of injury mortality. Findings from the ICE on injury statistics. International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics.","authors":"L A Fingerhut,&nbsp;C S Cox,&nbsp;M Warner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This report investigates international differences in injury mortality rates among 11 of the countries participating in the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cause, intent, and age-specific injury mortality rates are calculated and presented from Australia, Canada, Denmark, England & Wales, France, Israel, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Norway, Scotland, and the United States. Data are presented by cause (or mechanism) and intent (or manner of death) according to the matrix framework for presenting injury mortality statistics published in August 1997. The benefits of this matrix approach to investigating injury mortality are explained with numerous examples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Injury death rates are higher in France and Denmark and lower in England & Wales, Israel, and The Netherlands than elsewhere. New Zealand, the United States, and Norway had similar average annual injury death rates of 56-57 per 100,000 population. As an example of the benefit of presenting data in the matrix framework, the total poisoning death rate in Denmark for all categories of intent (13 per 100,000) is about twice the rate in the United States. Unintentional poisoning death rates, however, are similar in the United States and Denmark (about 4 per 100,000) and are higher than elsewhere. However, the suicide poisoning death rate in Denmark is 3 times the rate in the United States.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using these results, the ICE on Injury will be investigating death registration practices in each of the countries to better understand international variation in injury mortality due to reporting or registration procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":79552,"journal":{"name":"Advance data","volume":" 303","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This report investigates international differences in injury mortality rates among 11 of the countries participating in the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics.

Methods: The cause, intent, and age-specific injury mortality rates are calculated and presented from Australia, Canada, Denmark, England & Wales, France, Israel, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Norway, Scotland, and the United States. Data are presented by cause (or mechanism) and intent (or manner of death) according to the matrix framework for presenting injury mortality statistics published in August 1997. The benefits of this matrix approach to investigating injury mortality are explained with numerous examples.

Results: Injury death rates are higher in France and Denmark and lower in England & Wales, Israel, and The Netherlands than elsewhere. New Zealand, the United States, and Norway had similar average annual injury death rates of 56-57 per 100,000 population. As an example of the benefit of presenting data in the matrix framework, the total poisoning death rate in Denmark for all categories of intent (13 per 100,000) is about twice the rate in the United States. Unintentional poisoning death rates, however, are similar in the United States and Denmark (about 4 per 100,000) and are higher than elsewhere. However, the suicide poisoning death rate in Denmark is 3 times the rate in the United States.

Conclusion: Using these results, the ICE on Injury will be investigating death registration practices in each of the countries to better understand international variation in injury mortality due to reporting or registration procedures.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伤害死亡率的国际比较分析。来自ICE伤害统计的调查结果。伤害统计的国际合作努力。
目的:本报告调查参与国际伤害统计合作努力的11个国家在伤害死亡率方面的国际差异。方法:计算澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、英格兰和威尔士、法国、以色列、新西兰、荷兰、挪威、苏格兰和美国的原因、意图和年龄特异性伤害死亡率。数据按死因(或机制)和意图(或死亡方式)分列,根据1997年8月公布的提交伤害死亡率统计数据的矩阵框架。这种矩阵方法的好处,以调查伤害死亡率解释了许多例子。结果:伤害死亡率在法国和丹麦较高,在英格兰和威尔士、以色列和荷兰较低。新西兰、美国和挪威的年平均伤害死亡率相似,为每10万人56-57人。作为在矩阵框架中提供数据的好处的一个例子,丹麦所有意图类别的总中毒死亡率(每10万人中有13人)大约是美国的两倍。然而,美国和丹麦的意外中毒死亡率相似(约为每10万人中有4人),高于其他地方。然而,丹麦的自杀中毒死亡率是美国的3倍。结论:利用这些结果,ICE伤害研究中心将调查每个国家的死亡登记实践,以更好地了解由于报告或登记程序导致的伤害死亡率的国际差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy Eating Index scores among adults, 60 years of age and over, by sociodemographic and health characteristics: United States, 1999-2002. Health characteristics of the Asian adult population: United States, 2004-2006. Health characteristics of the Asian adult population: United States, 2004-2006. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Fall injury episodes among noninstitutionalized older adults: United States, 2001-2003.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1