Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis.

J S Smolen
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis.","authors":"J S Smolen","doi":"10.1080/030097499750042245-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":21501,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":"112 ","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/030097499750042245-1","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/030097499750042245-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the novel DMARD leflunomide was compared to placebo and sulfasalazine in a randomized, double-blind study. At Week 24, leflunomide significantly reduced tender and swollen joint counts and physician and patient assessment scores compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Response rates with leflunomide were significantly greater than placebo: ACR 20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001). Comparable response rates were observed with sulfasalazine (ACR 20%: 56%). Leflunomide significantly improved HAQ scores compared to placebo or sulfasalazine (P < 0.009). The onset of action with leflunomide was rapid and was seen as early as Week 2. Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide than placebo (P < 0.01). Leflunomide was well tolerated. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide in patients who opted to continue treatment for up to 2 years. Efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of RA was maintained at 2 years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型DMARD来氟米特治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:与安慰剂和磺胺氮嗪的比较
在一项随机双盲研究中,将新型DMARD来氟米特的疗效和安全性与安慰剂和磺胺嘧啶进行了比较。在第24周,与安慰剂相比,来氟米特显著减少了压痛和肿胀的关节计数以及医生和患者的评估评分(P < 0.001)。来氟米特的缓解率显著高于安慰剂:ACR为20% (55% vs 29%, P = 0.0001)。磺胺吡啶的有效率相当(ACR为20%:56%)。来氟米特与安慰剂或柳氮磺胺吡啶相比显著提高HAQ评分(P < 0.009)。来氟米特起效迅速,早在第2周就观察到。来氟米特组放射学疾病进展明显慢于安慰剂组(P < 0.01)。来氟米特耐受性良好。在选择继续治疗长达2年的患者中,没有报告来氟米特的长期安全性问题。来氟米特治疗RA的疗效维持2年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract of the 35th Scandinavian Congress of Rheumatology, September 20-23, 2014, Stockholm, Sweden. Abstracts of the 34th Scandinavian Congress of Rheumatology. Copenhagen, Denmark. September 2-5, 2012. How should impaired morning function in rheumatoid arthritis be treated? Morning symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis: a defining characteristic and marker of active disease. Impact of impaired morning function on the lives and well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1