Minimal access esophagectomy: where are we up to?

D Gossot, L Toledo, A Cortes
{"title":"Minimal access esophagectomy: where are we up to?","authors":"D Gossot,&nbsp;L Toledo,&nbsp;A Cortes","doi":"10.1053/slas.2000.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy are disparate. The aim of this article is to describe the main surgical endoscopic techniques applied to esophagectomy and to report their results. In most published series, the benefit in terms of postoperative morbidity cannot be demonstrated. This reflects the fact that postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy is related not only with the type of surgical approach but also with other factors related to the patient's status. Finally, the lack of long-term follow-up in most series does not permit to draw conclusion about the relevance of endoscopic esophagectomy. Contrary to other advanced surgical endoscopic procedures, endoscopic esophagectomy has not yet been convincing.</p>","PeriodicalId":79535,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"2-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/slas.2000.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy are disparate. The aim of this article is to describe the main surgical endoscopic techniques applied to esophagectomy and to report their results. In most published series, the benefit in terms of postoperative morbidity cannot be demonstrated. This reflects the fact that postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy is related not only with the type of surgical approach but also with other factors related to the patient's status. Finally, the lack of long-term follow-up in most series does not permit to draw conclusion about the relevance of endoscopic esophagectomy. Contrary to other advanced surgical endoscopic procedures, endoscopic esophagectomy has not yet been convincing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创食管切除术:进展如何?
食管切除术的内镜技术是不同的。本文的目的是描述用于食管切除术的主要手术内窥镜技术并报告其结果。在大多数已发表的系列文章中,不能证明在术后发病率方面的益处。这反映了食管切除术后的术后发病率不仅与手术入路类型有关,还与其他与患者状态相关的因素有关。最后,大多数系列缺乏长期随访,无法得出内镜食管切除术相关性的结论。与其他先进的外科内镜手术相反,内镜食管切除术尚未令人信服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concluding Remarks. Clinical value of intra-operative ultrasonography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minimally invasive esophageal resection. The massive hiatal hernia: dealing with the defect. The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1