FDG-PET and CT in Evaluation of Chemotherapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Thomas A Dalsaso Jr MD , Val J Lowe MD , Frank R Dunphy MD , David S Martin MD , James H Boyd MD , Brendan C Stack Jr MD
{"title":"FDG-PET and CT in Evaluation of Chemotherapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer","authors":"Thomas A Dalsaso Jr MD ,&nbsp;Val J Lowe MD ,&nbsp;Frank R Dunphy MD ,&nbsp;David S Martin MD ,&nbsp;James H Boyd MD ,&nbsp;Brendan C Stack Jr MD","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(99)00074-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To compare [<sup>18</sup>F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans in assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> In a prospective clinical study, advanced head and neck cancer patients were enrolled in a neoadjuvant organ preservation protocol and received CT and FDG-PET scans prior to and after 2 or 3 rounds of chemotherapy. All patients had prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy tissue biopsies within the tumor region. Patients were then classified as pathologic complete response (PCR) or residual disease (RD) based on biopsies. Analysis of the tumor activity, using FDG-PET, was performed using standardized uptake ratios (SUR) in the region of the primary tumor. Analysis of the tumor size, using contrast enhanced CT, was performed using measurements of the primary tumor in 3 dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Nineteen of the 28 patients with stage III and IV cancer of the head and neck enrolled between December 1994 and May 1996 completed the study. Three patients were PCR and had a mean SUR reduction of 82% by positron emission tomography (PET) and volume reduction of 80% by CT. Sixteen patients had RD after chemotherapy, their SUR and volume reductions were 32% and 41%, respectively. Reduction in SUR with PET was significant <span><math><mtext>P = 0.01</mtext></math></span>. The mean tumor volume reduction by CT approached statistical significance <span><math><mtext>P = 0.09</mtext></math></span>. There was a positive correlation between the percent reduction in tumor volume and SUR (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> FDG-PET and CT imaging are at least equivalent in correctly assessing tumor response to chemotherapy with a trend toward better performance by PET.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(99)00074-6","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039799000746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Purpose: To compare [18F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans in assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.

Materials and Methods: In a prospective clinical study, advanced head and neck cancer patients were enrolled in a neoadjuvant organ preservation protocol and received CT and FDG-PET scans prior to and after 2 or 3 rounds of chemotherapy. All patients had prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy tissue biopsies within the tumor region. Patients were then classified as pathologic complete response (PCR) or residual disease (RD) based on biopsies. Analysis of the tumor activity, using FDG-PET, was performed using standardized uptake ratios (SUR) in the region of the primary tumor. Analysis of the tumor size, using contrast enhanced CT, was performed using measurements of the primary tumor in 3 dimensions.

Results: Nineteen of the 28 patients with stage III and IV cancer of the head and neck enrolled between December 1994 and May 1996 completed the study. Three patients were PCR and had a mean SUR reduction of 82% by positron emission tomography (PET) and volume reduction of 80% by CT. Sixteen patients had RD after chemotherapy, their SUR and volume reductions were 32% and 41%, respectively. Reduction in SUR with PET was significant P = 0.01. The mean tumor volume reduction by CT approached statistical significance P = 0.09. There was a positive correlation between the percent reduction in tumor volume and SUR (P < 0.004).

Conclusion: FDG-PET and CT imaging are at least equivalent in correctly assessing tumor response to chemotherapy with a trend toward better performance by PET.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDG-PET与CT对晚期头颈部肿瘤化疗的评价
目的:比较[18F]2-脱氧-2-氟-d -葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估晚期头颈癌新辅助化疗反应中的作用。材料与方法:在一项前瞻性临床研究中,晚期头颈癌患者被纳入新辅助器官保存方案,并在2轮或3轮化疗前后接受CT和FDG-PET扫描。所有患者化疗前及化疗后均行肿瘤区域组织活检。然后根据活检将患者分为病理完全缓解(PCR)或残留疾病(RD)。使用FDG-PET分析肿瘤活性,在原发肿瘤区域使用标准化摄取比(SUR)进行。使用增强CT对原发肿瘤进行三维测量,分析肿瘤大小。结果:在1994年12月至1996年5月期间入组的28例头颈部III期和IV期癌症患者中,有19例完成了研究。3例患者采用PCR,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的平均SUR减少82%,CT的体积减少80%。16例患者化疗后出现RD,其SUR和体积减少分别为32%和41%。PET降低SUR显著P = 0.01。CT平均肿瘤体积缩小量接近统计学意义P = 0.09。肿瘤体积缩小百分比与SUR呈正相关(P <0.004)。结论:FDG-PET与CT成像在正确评估肿瘤化疗反应方面至少相当,PET有更好的表现趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Attenuation-Correction Induced Artifact in F-18 FDG PET Imaging Following Total Knee Replacement Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and the Changing Face of China Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG-PET in the Suspicion of Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma Based on Elevated Tumor Marker Serum Levels Superphysiologic FDG Uptake in the Non-Paralyzed Vocal Cord. Resolution of a False-Positive PET Result with Combined PET-CT Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1