Differences in Young Adult Psychopathology Among Drug Abstainers, Experimenters, and Frequent Users

Richard Milich Ph.D., Don Lynam Ph.D., Rick Zimmerman Ph.D., T.K Logan Ph.D., Catherine Martin M.D., Carl Leukefeld Ph.D., Charity Portis M.A., Josh Miller M.A., Richard Clayton Ph.D.
{"title":"Differences in Young Adult Psychopathology Among Drug Abstainers, Experimenters, and Frequent Users","authors":"Richard Milich Ph.D.,&nbsp;Don Lynam Ph.D.,&nbsp;Rick Zimmerman Ph.D.,&nbsp;T.K Logan Ph.D.,&nbsp;Catherine Martin M.D.,&nbsp;Carl Leukefeld Ph.D.,&nbsp;Charity Portis M.A.,&nbsp;Josh Miller M.A.,&nbsp;Richard Clayton Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(99)00021-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shedler and Block offered the provocative proposal that individuals who experiment with drugs are psychologically healthier than either those who abstain completely or those who are frequent users. Not all studies have come to such conclusions, however. In an effort to specify under what conditions Shedler and Block's conclusions might hold, the present study examined three groups of drug users (abstainers, experimenters, frequent users) classified according to three different criteria: (a) marijuana use at age 20; (b) alcohol use during 10th grade; and (c) alcohol use at age 20. The three groups were compared at age 20 in terms of personality, deviant behavior, and psychopathology. The results revealed that abstainers were never more psychologically impaired, and were occasionally healthier, than experimenters. Frequent users of marijuana were consistently more impaired than both the abstainers and experimenters, in terms of both internalizing and externalizing disorders. Classification according to marijuana use appeared to be more related to psychopathology than did classification according to alcohol use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(99)00021-8","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328999000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Shedler and Block offered the provocative proposal that individuals who experiment with drugs are psychologically healthier than either those who abstain completely or those who are frequent users. Not all studies have come to such conclusions, however. In an effort to specify under what conditions Shedler and Block's conclusions might hold, the present study examined three groups of drug users (abstainers, experimenters, frequent users) classified according to three different criteria: (a) marijuana use at age 20; (b) alcohol use during 10th grade; and (c) alcohol use at age 20. The three groups were compared at age 20 in terms of personality, deviant behavior, and psychopathology. The results revealed that abstainers were never more psychologically impaired, and were occasionally healthier, than experimenters. Frequent users of marijuana were consistently more impaired than both the abstainers and experimenters, in terms of both internalizing and externalizing disorders. Classification according to marijuana use appeared to be more related to psychopathology than did classification according to alcohol use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年戒断者、吸毒者和常吸毒者的精神病理差异
谢德勒和布洛克提出了一个具有挑衅性的建议,即与完全戒除毒品或经常使用毒品的人相比,尝试吸毒的人在心理上更健康。然而,并非所有的研究都得出了这样的结论。为了明确谢德勒和布洛克的结论可能在什么条件下成立,本研究根据三个不同的标准对三组吸毒者(戒酒者、试验者、频繁吸毒者)进行了调查:(a) 20岁时使用大麻;(b) 10年级期间的饮酒情况;(c) 20岁时饮酒。三组在20岁时进行性格、异常行为和精神病理方面的比较。结果显示,不喝酒的人的心理损害并不比实验者更严重,偶尔还会更健康。在内在化和外在化障碍方面,经常吸食大麻的人比不吸食大麻的人和实验者都受到更大的损害。根据大麻使用情况进行分类似乎比根据酒精使用情况进行分类与精神病理学的关系更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Childhood emotional abuse and depression: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and resilience From night owl to angry bird: Investigating the association between chronotype and aggression ‘You never cared about me’: An analysis of ethnic minority men’s coping mechanisms and risk factors after a relationship breakdown Change in psychosocial functioning and social relations among women in residential substance abuse treatment Prediction of DISC substance abuse and dependency for ethnically diverse adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1