Does the intrauterine device carry the risk of immunity to sperm?

B Vural, F Vural, A Corakçi, S Türkoğlu, A Erk
{"title":"Does the intrauterine device carry the risk of immunity to sperm?","authors":"B Vural,&nbsp;F Vural,&nbsp;A Corakçi,&nbsp;S Türkoğlu,&nbsp;A Erk","doi":"10.1023/a:1006679427572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the second most commonly used contraceptive method in the world. A number of mechanisms have been proposed by which IUDs could interfere with reproductive processes. In this study, the relationship between intrauterine devices and the risk of antisperm antibody (ASA) production in the absence of prior sensitization was investigated. Sixty-two IUD users (group 1) and 42 women with no contraceptive use as a control group (group 2) were included in the study. Six months after the IUD insertion, 4 women in group 1 and 2 women in group 2 with lower genital tract infections were excluded from the study. The sera of the remaining 58 women in group 1 and 40 women in group 2 were evaluated again for the presence of ASA. Twelve patients (20.7%) in group 1 and 12 patients (30.0%) in group 2 had ASA positivity. When we compared the ASA levels in the IUD group with those in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). In summary, our data proved that copper-containing intrauterine devices in the absence of prior sensitization do not significantly affect immunity to sperm in sera of women.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"15 1","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006679427572","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006679427572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the second most commonly used contraceptive method in the world. A number of mechanisms have been proposed by which IUDs could interfere with reproductive processes. In this study, the relationship between intrauterine devices and the risk of antisperm antibody (ASA) production in the absence of prior sensitization was investigated. Sixty-two IUD users (group 1) and 42 women with no contraceptive use as a control group (group 2) were included in the study. Six months after the IUD insertion, 4 women in group 1 and 2 women in group 2 with lower genital tract infections were excluded from the study. The sera of the remaining 58 women in group 1 and 40 women in group 2 were evaluated again for the presence of ASA. Twelve patients (20.7%) in group 1 and 12 patients (30.0%) in group 2 had ASA positivity. When we compared the ASA levels in the IUD group with those in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). In summary, our data proved that copper-containing intrauterine devices in the absence of prior sensitization do not significantly affect immunity to sperm in sera of women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫内节育器有对精子免疫的风险吗?
宫内节育器(iud)是世界上第二常用的避孕方法。已经提出了宫内节育器可能干扰生殖过程的一些机制。在这项研究中,在没有事先致敏的情况下,研究了宫内节育器与抗精子抗体(ASA)产生风险之间的关系。研究包括62名宫内节育器使用者(第一组)和42名未使用避孕措施的妇女作为对照组(第二组)。在宫内节育器植入6个月后,1组4例、2组2例下生殖道感染患者被排除在研究之外。1组其余58名妇女和2组40名妇女的血清再次评估是否存在ASA。ASA阳性1组12例(20.7%),2组12例(30.0%)。节育器组ASA水平与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。总之,我们的数据证明,在没有事先致敏的情况下,含铜宫内节育器不会显著影响妇女血清对精子的免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nota editorial Workshop papers Free communications 1 Free communications 2 Free communications 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1