Cystourethroscopic findings before and after prostate brachytherapy.

Techniques in urology Pub Date : 2000-06-01
G Gray, K Wallner, J Roof, J Corman
{"title":"Cystourethroscopic findings before and after prostate brachytherapy.","authors":"G Gray,&nbsp;K Wallner,&nbsp;J Roof,&nbsp;J Corman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the role of cystourethroscopy in predicting the risk of postimplant urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen unselected prostate brachytherapy patients implanted with 125I or 103Pd under spinal or general anesthesia were studied. Following induction of anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lithotomy position and cystourethroscopy performed using a 17 sheath and a 30 degrees lens. Irrigation pressure was 100-cm water. A photograph was taken from the level of the verumontanum. At completion of the implant procedure, a second cystourethroscopy was performed and another photograph taken. The degree of obstruction was rated using a 3-point scale. Each patient was contacted at the time of this report to update postimplant morbidity information with follow-up from 1 to 10 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' preimplant cystourethroscopic findings ranged from minimal to complete occlusion. There was no clear relationship between the American Urologic Association (AUA) score or preimplant prostate volume and the degree of obstruction. Nearly all patients had some increased physical obstruction following completion of the procedure, but only 8 of 14 patients had an increase in obstruction grade. Six patients were completely obstructed at the completion of the implant procedure, only one of whom developed urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Marked variability in cystourethroscopy findings do not appear to have a strong influence on the likelihood of postimplant urinary retention and are not a reliable predictor of retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":79536,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in urology","volume":"6 2","pages":"109-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the role of cystourethroscopy in predicting the risk of postimplant urinary retention.

Materials and methods: Fifteen unselected prostate brachytherapy patients implanted with 125I or 103Pd under spinal or general anesthesia were studied. Following induction of anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lithotomy position and cystourethroscopy performed using a 17 sheath and a 30 degrees lens. Irrigation pressure was 100-cm water. A photograph was taken from the level of the verumontanum. At completion of the implant procedure, a second cystourethroscopy was performed and another photograph taken. The degree of obstruction was rated using a 3-point scale. Each patient was contacted at the time of this report to update postimplant morbidity information with follow-up from 1 to 10 months.

Results: The patients' preimplant cystourethroscopic findings ranged from minimal to complete occlusion. There was no clear relationship between the American Urologic Association (AUA) score or preimplant prostate volume and the degree of obstruction. Nearly all patients had some increased physical obstruction following completion of the procedure, but only 8 of 14 patients had an increase in obstruction grade. Six patients were completely obstructed at the completion of the implant procedure, only one of whom developed urinary retention.

Conclusions: Marked variability in cystourethroscopy findings do not appear to have a strong influence on the likelihood of postimplant urinary retention and are not a reliable predictor of retention.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺近距离治疗前后膀胱输尿管镜检查结果。
目的:评价膀胱输尿管镜在预测移植后尿潴留风险中的作用。材料与方法:对15例未经选择的前列腺近距离放射治疗患者在脊髓或全身麻醉下植入125I或103Pd进行研究。麻醉诱导后,将患者置于取石位,使用17鞘和30度晶状体进行膀胱输尿管镜检查。灌溉压力为100 cm水。一张照片是从verumontanum的高度拍摄的。植入手术完成后,进行第二次膀胱输尿管镜检查并拍摄另一张照片。阻塞程度采用3分制进行评定。在本报告发表时,我们联系了每位患者,随访1至10个月,更新移植后发病率信息。结果:患者植入前膀胱输尿管镜检查结果从轻微到完全闭塞不等。美国泌尿学协会(AUA)评分或植入前前列腺体积与梗阻程度之间没有明确的关系。几乎所有患者在完成手术后都有一些增加的物理阻塞,但14例患者中只有8例阻塞等级增加。6例患者在完成植入过程时完全阻塞,其中只有1例发生尿潴留。结论:膀胱输尿管镜检查结果的显著变异性似乎对移植后尿潴留的可能性没有很大的影响,也不是尿潴留的可靠预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Male Slings for Postprostatectomy Incontinence In situ anterior vaginal wall sling. Interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate. In situ anterior vaginal wall sling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1