Assessment of pancreatic enzyme secretory capacity by a modified Lundh test.

L Czakó, F Hajnal, J Németh, J Lonovics
{"title":"Assessment of pancreatic enzyme secretory capacity by a modified Lundh test.","authors":"L Czakó,&nbsp;F Hajnal,&nbsp;J Németh,&nbsp;J Lonovics","doi":"10.1385/IJGC:27:1:13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lundh test is a usual means of estimating the enzyme secretory capacity of the gland. During this procedure, however, a major proportion of the test meal is removed from the duodenum together with the gastric, duodenal, and pancreatic secretions and the bile. This study was undertaken to compare the pancreatic enzyme secretion induced by the Lundh procedure with that resulting from stimulation of the normal digestive process, by reinfusion of the aspirated duodenal juice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine men (mean age: 46.7, range 42-55 yr) free from pancreatic disease were studied. Pancreatic secretion was measured via a multiple lumen tube by aspiration of the duodenal juice. After a basal period the Lundh test meal was placed in the stomach and the duodenal juice was completely aspirated. On a separate day, the procedure was repeated, but the aspirated duodenal juice was reinfused into the upper jejunum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 30 min of the test period, the enzyme outputs were the same on both test days. In the 30-60-min period, the lipase output, and in the 75-90-min period, the amylase output was significantly lower during the Lundh test compared with the jejunal reinfusion test. The CCK levels were significantly above the basal level at 20 and 40 min, but the increase was significantly lower during the traditional Lundh test. No significant difference in gastrin release was observed during either the Lundh or the reinfusion test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the traditional Lundh test, the trypsin secretory capacities of the gland are measured appropriately, but the lipase and amylase secretory capacity and the CCK release are not fully represented compared with the reinfusion test. An association between the lower CCK release and lipase amylase secretion is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":73464,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/IJGC:27:1:13","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/IJGC:27:1:13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The Lundh test is a usual means of estimating the enzyme secretory capacity of the gland. During this procedure, however, a major proportion of the test meal is removed from the duodenum together with the gastric, duodenal, and pancreatic secretions and the bile. This study was undertaken to compare the pancreatic enzyme secretion induced by the Lundh procedure with that resulting from stimulation of the normal digestive process, by reinfusion of the aspirated duodenal juice.

Methods: Nine men (mean age: 46.7, range 42-55 yr) free from pancreatic disease were studied. Pancreatic secretion was measured via a multiple lumen tube by aspiration of the duodenal juice. After a basal period the Lundh test meal was placed in the stomach and the duodenal juice was completely aspirated. On a separate day, the procedure was repeated, but the aspirated duodenal juice was reinfused into the upper jejunum.

Results: In the first 30 min of the test period, the enzyme outputs were the same on both test days. In the 30-60-min period, the lipase output, and in the 75-90-min period, the amylase output was significantly lower during the Lundh test compared with the jejunal reinfusion test. The CCK levels were significantly above the basal level at 20 and 40 min, but the increase was significantly lower during the traditional Lundh test. No significant difference in gastrin release was observed during either the Lundh or the reinfusion test.

Conclusions: In the traditional Lundh test, the trypsin secretory capacities of the gland are measured appropriately, but the lipase and amylase secretory capacity and the CCK release are not fully represented compared with the reinfusion test. An association between the lower CCK release and lipase amylase secretion is suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良Lundh试验评估胰酶分泌能力。
背景:伦德试验是估计腺体酶分泌能力的常用手段。然而,在此过程中,大部分试验饲料连同胃、十二指肠、胰腺分泌物和胆汁一起从十二指肠取出。本研究是为了比较Lundh手术诱导的胰酶分泌与通过回输吸入的十二指肠液刺激正常消化过程所产生的胰酶分泌。方法:9例无胰腺疾病的男性,平均年龄46.7岁,42 ~ 55岁。胰分泌量通过多腔管吸入十二指肠液测定。在基础期后,将Lundh试验餐放入胃中,并完全吸出十二指肠液。在另一天,重复该程序,但将抽吸的十二指肠液重新注入上部空肠。结果:在试验前30分钟,两个试验日的酶输出量相同。Lundh试验在30-60 min期间脂肪酶排泄量显著低于空肠回输试验,在75-90 min期间淀粉酶排泄量显著低于空肠回输试验。CCK水平在20和40 min显著高于基础水平,但在传统Lundh试验中,CCK水平的升高明显低于基础水平。在Lundh和回输试验期间,胃泌素释放均无显著差异。结论:在传统的Lundh试验中,腺体胰蛋白酶分泌能力得到了适当的测量,但脂肪酶和淀粉酶分泌能力和CCK释放量与回输试验相比没有得到充分的反映。低CCK释放与脂肪酶淀粉酶分泌之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Photodynamic therapy for pancreatic and biliary tract carcinoma Colonic carcinoma resembling submucosal tumor Notes on 5th Annual Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research Conference, Boston, 2003 Letter from the editor Introduction to special issue of IJGC on imaging in pancreatic disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1