Comparison of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid approach: vestibular nerve section versus vestibular schwannoma resection.

C G Jackson, B M McGrew, J A Forest, C R Hampf, M E Glasscock, J L Brandes, M B Hanson
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid approach: vestibular nerve section versus vestibular schwannoma resection.","authors":"C G Jackson,&nbsp;B M McGrew,&nbsp;J A Forest,&nbsp;C R Hampf,&nbsp;M E Glasscock,&nbsp;J L Brandes,&nbsp;M B Hanson","doi":"10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80053-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate intradural drilling as a mechanism for the development of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid craniectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of charts was performed on 565 retrosigmoid approaches to the cerebellopontine angle performed between January 1980 and January 1998. Patients treated with retrosigmoid vestibular nerve section without intradural drilling were compared with patients who underwent retrosigmoid removal of vestibular schwannomas in which intradural drilling was performed for exposure of the internal auditory canal.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing retrosigmoid approach between January 1980 and January 1998 were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The presence of headache, duration of headache, and severity of headache were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this large series, 54% of patients experienced headaches after vestibular schwannoma removal, and 5% of patients experienced headaches after vestibular nerve section (p < 0.01, chi-square).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative headache is not a characteristic of retrosigmoid craniectomy in the absence of intradural drilling. Intradural drilling is a probable cause of headache after the retrosigmoid approach. Cranioplasty is not necessary to prevent a high incidence of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 3","pages":"412-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80053-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate intradural drilling as a mechanism for the development of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid craniectomy.

Study design: A retrospective review of charts was performed on 565 retrosigmoid approaches to the cerebellopontine angle performed between January 1980 and January 1998. Patients treated with retrosigmoid vestibular nerve section without intradural drilling were compared with patients who underwent retrosigmoid removal of vestibular schwannomas in which intradural drilling was performed for exposure of the internal auditory canal.

Setting: Private practice tertiary referral center.

Patients: Consecutive patients undergoing retrosigmoid approach between January 1980 and January 1998 were reviewed.

Main outcome measures: The presence of headache, duration of headache, and severity of headache were noted.

Results: In this large series, 54% of patients experienced headaches after vestibular schwannoma removal, and 5% of patients experienced headaches after vestibular nerve section (p < 0.01, chi-square).

Conclusions: Postoperative headache is not a characteristic of retrosigmoid craniectomy in the absence of intradural drilling. Intradural drilling is a probable cause of headache after the retrosigmoid approach. Cranioplasty is not necessary to prevent a high incidence of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙状结肠后入路前庭神经切断术与前庭神经鞘瘤切除术术后头痛的比较。
目的:探讨硬膜内钻孔在乙状结肠后颅骨切除术后头痛发生中的作用机制。研究设计:回顾性分析1980年1月至1998年1月间565例乙状窦后入路进入桥小脑角的病例。对乙状结肠后行前庭神经切开术而不进行硬膜内钻孔的患者与行乙状结肠后切除前庭神经鞘瘤的患者进行比较,其中硬膜内钻孔用于暴露内耳道。单位:私人执业三级转诊中心。患者:回顾了1980年1月至1998年1月连续接受乙状结肠后入路的患者。主要结局指标:记录头痛的出现、头痛的持续时间和头痛的严重程度。结果:在这个大系列中,54%的患者在前庭神经鞘瘤切除后出现头痛,5%的患者在前庭神经切开术后出现头痛(p < 0.01,卡方)。结论:无硬膜内钻孔乙状结肠后颅骨切除术的特点不是术后头痛。硬膜内钻孔是乙状窦后入路后头痛的可能原因。为了避免乙状结肠后入路术后头痛的高发,颅骨成形术是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced hearing loss Petrous Apex Lesions Falls in patients with vestibular deficits. Osteomas of the internal auditory canal: a report of two cases. Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1